From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH procfs] Add process age
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:48:48 +0200
Message-ID: <20100726144848.GC17756@basil.fritz.box>
References: <1279907271.4335.3.camel@cowboy>
 <20100723183549.GA10518@x200>
 <1279910830.1851.5.camel@cowboy>
 <87fwz6it0e.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
 <1280152668.2212.1.camel@cowboy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave.bueso@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1280152668.2212.1.camel@cowboy>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

> True, but there are also many other no-so-useful files under /proc that
> can also be replaced by userspace apps.

Example? 

-andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.