linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	stable@kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>, Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>,
	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
	Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: raise the bar to PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC stalls
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:17:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100730131735.GZ16655@random.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100728071705.GA22964@localhost>

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:17:05PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Fix "system goes unresponsive under memory pressure and lots of
> dirty/writeback pages" bug.
> 
> 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/4/86
> 
> In the above thread, Andreas Mohr described that
> 
> 	Invoking any command locked up for minutes (note that I'm
> 	talking about attempted additional I/O to the _other_,
> 	_unaffected_ main system HDD - such as loading some shell
> 	binaries -, NOT the external SSD18M!!).
> 
> This happens when the two conditions are both meet:
> - under memory pressure
> - writing heavily to a slow device
> 
> OOM also happens in Andreas' system. The OOM trace shows that 3
> processes are stuck in wait_on_page_writeback() in the direct reclaim
> path. One in do_fork() and the other two in unix_stream_sendmsg(). They
> are blocked on this condition:
> 
> 	(sc->order && priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
> 
> which was introduced in commit 78dc583d (vmscan: low order lumpy reclaim
> also should use PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC) one year ago. That condition may be too
> permissive. In Andreas' case, 512MB/1024 = 512KB. If the direct reclaim
> for the order-1 fork() allocation runs into a range of 512KB
> hard-to-reclaim LRU pages, it will be stalled.
> 
> It's a severe problem in three ways.

Lumpy reclaim just made the system totally unusable with frequent
order 9 allocations. I nuked it long ago and replaced it with mem
compaction. You may try aa.git to test how thing goes without lumpy
reclaim. I recently also started to use mem compaction for order 1/2/3
allocations as there's no point not to use it for them, and to call
mem compaction from kswapd to satisfy order 2 GFP_ATOMIC in
replacement of blind responsiveness-destroyer lumpy.

Not sure why people insists on lumpy when we've memory compaction that
won't alter the working set and it's more effective.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-30 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-28  7:17 [PATCH] vmscan: raise the bar to PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC stalls Wu Fengguang
2010-07-28  7:49 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-28  8:46   ` [PATCH] vmscan: remove wait_on_page_writeback() from pageout() Wu Fengguang
2010-07-28  9:10     ` Mel Gorman
2010-07-28  9:30       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-07-28  9:45         ` Mel Gorman
2010-07-28  9:43       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-28  9:50         ` Mel Gorman
2010-07-28  9:59           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-01  5:27             ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-01  5:49               ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-01  8:32               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-01  8:35                 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-01  8:40                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-01  5:17         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-07-28 16:29     ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-28 11:40 ` Why PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC stalls for a long time KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-28 13:10   ` Mel Gorman
2010-07-29 10:34     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-29 14:24       ` Mel Gorman
2010-07-30  4:54         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-30 10:30           ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-01  8:47             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-04 11:10               ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-05  6:20                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-05  8:09                   ` Andreas Mohr
2010-07-28 17:30   ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-29  1:01     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-30 13:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2010-07-30 13:31   ` [PATCH] vmscan: raise the bar to PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC stalls Mel Gorman
2010-07-31 16:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-07-31 17:33   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-31 17:55     ` Pekka Enberg
2010-07-31 17:59       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-31 18:09         ` Pekka Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100730131735.GZ16655@random.random \
    --to=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@lisas.de \
    --cc=bgamari.foss@gmail.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).