From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.35 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:49:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20100803094940.GC31096@basil.fritz.box> References: <20100802023322.GA19164@dastard> <87tyncds89.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20100803092823.GA5324@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List To: Nick Piggin Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100803092823.GA5324@amd> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 07:28:23PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > OK, vfs-scale-working branch now has commits to enable rcu-walk aware > d_revalidate, permission, and check_acl in the filesystems, and > implements a basic rcu-walk aware scheme for generic/posix acls and Cool. I was just looking at that. > I was under the impression that ACLs on directories are not that common, > so maybe this is as far as we need to go for now anyway. Yes it shouldn't be common normally. I think the common case for distros is just a few ACLs in /dev. Of course you never know for specific end user workloads. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.