From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.35
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:05:51 -0300
Message-ID: <20100803150551.GA15530@khazad-dum.debian.net>
References: <AANLkTim8FALeVG+NPLNLEQChu=dPD=GHSpnxmZHYgsNx@mail.gmail.com>
 <20100802023322.GA19164@dastard>
 <87tyncds89.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
 <20100803092823.GA5324@amd>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100803092823.GA5324@amd>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 03 Aug 2010, Nick Piggin wrote:
> I was under the impression that ACLs on directories are not that common,
> so maybe this is as far as we need to go for now anyway.

They are quite common on fileserver data areas, at least on the places where
I worked at.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh