From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: Bug 12309 - Large I/O operations result in poor interactive performance and high iowait times Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 15:35:35 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20100803153420.39FD.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20100802171954.4F95.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100802115748.GA5308@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Andrew Clayton , Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Dave Chinner , Chris Mason , Nick Piggin , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Andrea Arcangeli , "pvz@pvz.pp.se" , "bgamari@gmail.com" , "larppaxyz@gmail.com" , "seanj@xyke To: Wu Fengguang Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100802115748.GA5308@localhost> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org > > It mean congestion ignorerance is happend when followings > > (1) the task is kswapd > > (2) the task is flusher thread > > (3) this reclaim is called from zone reclaim (note: I'm thinking this is bug) > > (4) this reclaim is called from __generic_file_aio_write() > > > > (4) is root cause of this latency issue. this behavior was introduced > > by following. > > Yes and no. > > (1)-(4) are good summaries for regular files. However !bdi_write_congested(bdi) > is now unconditionally true for the swapper_space, which means any process can > do swap out to a congested queue and block there. Oops. I missed that. thanks correct me! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org