From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/13] writeback: dont redirty tail an inode with dirty pages
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:10:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100805162433.245060719@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20100805161051.501816677@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-xfs-fast-redirty.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3022 bytes --]
This extends commit b3af9468ae (writeback: don't delay inodes redirtied
by a fast dirtier) to the !kupdate case.
It also simplifies logic. Note that the I_DIRTY_PAGES test/handling is
merged into the PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY case. I_DIRTY_PAGES (at the line
removed by this patch) means there are _new_ pages get dirtied during
writeback, while PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY means there are dirty pages. In
this sense, the PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY test covers the I_DIRTY_PAGES case.
In *_set_page_dirty*(), PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY is set racelessly, while
I_DIRTY_PAGES might be set on the inode for a page just truncated. It
has no real impact on this patch -- it's actually slightly better now.
afs_fsync() always set I_DIRTY_PAGES after calling afs_writepages(),
maybe to keep the inode in the dirty list. That's a different code path,
so won't impact the requeue-vs-redirty timing here permenantly.
CC: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
CC: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- linux-next.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2010-07-11 09:13:30.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/fs/fs-writeback.c 2010-07-12 23:26:06.000000000 +0800
@@ -367,18 +367,7 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *ino
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
inode->i_state &= ~I_SYNC;
if (!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING)) {
- if ((inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_PAGES) && wbc->for_kupdate) {
- /*
- * More pages get dirtied by a fast dirtier.
- */
- goto select_queue;
- } else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
- /*
- * At least XFS will redirty the inode during the
- * writeback (delalloc) and on io completion (isize).
- */
- redirty_tail(inode);
- } else if (mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
+ if (mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
/*
* We didn't write back all the pages. nfs_writepages()
* sometimes bales out without doing anything. Redirty
@@ -400,7 +389,6 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *ino
* soon as the queue becomes uncongested.
*/
inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
-select_queue:
if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
/*
* slice used up: queue for next turn
@@ -423,6 +411,14 @@ select_queue:
inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
redirty_tail(inode);
}
+ } else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
+ /*
+ * Filesystems can dirty the inode during writeback
+ * operations, such as delayed allocation during
+ * submission or metadata updates after data IO
+ * completion.
+ */
+ redirty_tail(inode);
} else if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count)) {
/*
* The inode is clean, inuse
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-05 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-05 16:10 [PATCH 00/13] writeback patches for 2.6.36 Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 01/13] writeback: reduce calls to global_page_state in balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 02/13] writeback: avoid unnecessary calculation of bdi dirty thresholds Wu Fengguang
2010-08-06 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 03/13] writeback: add comment to the dirty limits functions Wu Fengguang
2010-08-06 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-07 16:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:10 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 05/13] writeback: fix queue_io() ordering Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 06/13] writeback: merge for_kupdate and !for_kupdate cases Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 07/13] writeback: explicit low bound for vm.dirty_ratio Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 23:34 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-06 12:44 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-10 3:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-10 3:57 ` Neil Brown
2010-08-10 13:29 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-10 18:12 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-10 18:06 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:10 ` [PATCH 08/13] writeback: pass writeback_control down to move_expired_inodes() Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:11 ` [PATCH 09/13] writeback: the kupdate expire timestamp should be a moving target Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:11 ` [PATCH 10/13] writeback: kill writeback_control.more_io Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:11 ` [PATCH 11/13] writeback: sync expired inodes first in background writeback Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 16:11 ` [PATCH 12/13] writeback: try more writeback as long as something was written Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 17:00 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-05 22:39 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 22:50 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-05 16:11 ` [PATCH 13/13] writeback: introduce writeback_control.inodes_written Wu Fengguang
2010-08-05 23:08 ` [PATCH 00/13] writeback patches for 2.6.36 Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100805162433.245060719@intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).