* [PATCH -next] quota: fix QUOTACTL kconfig for gfs2 @ 2010-08-11 23:24 Randy Dunlap 2010-08-12 2:46 ` Jan Kara 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-08-11 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-fsdevel; +Cc: Jan Kara, Steven Whitehouse From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> warning: (GFS2_FS && BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && (64BIT || LBDAF)) selects QUOTACTL which has unmet direct dependencies (XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA) Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com --- fs/quota/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) However, the "depends on" line here seems like overkill to me. --- linux-next-20100810.orig/fs/quota/Kconfig +++ linux-next-20100810/fs/quota/Kconfig @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ config QFMT_V2 config QUOTACTL bool - depends on XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA + depends on XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA || GFS2_FS default y config QUOTACTL_COMPAT ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] quota: fix QUOTACTL kconfig for gfs2 2010-08-11 23:24 [PATCH -next] quota: fix QUOTACTL kconfig for gfs2 Randy Dunlap @ 2010-08-12 2:46 ` Jan Kara 2010-08-12 15:39 ` Randy Dunlap 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jan Kara @ 2010-08-12 2:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, Jan Kara, Steven Whitehouse On Wed 11-08-10 16:24:35, Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> > > warning: (GFS2_FS && BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && (64BIT || LBDAF)) selects QUOTACTL which has unmet direct dependencies (XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA) > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> > Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> > Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com > --- > fs/quota/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > However, the "depends on" line here seems like overkill to me. OK, so do you mean that making QUOTACTL default to 'n', removing the depends on line and letting QUOTA, XFS_QUOTA, and GFS2_QUOTA select QUOTACTL would be better? Honza > > > --- linux-next-20100810.orig/fs/quota/Kconfig > +++ linux-next-20100810/fs/quota/Kconfig > @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ config QFMT_V2 > > config QUOTACTL > bool > - depends on XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA > + depends on XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA || GFS2_FS > default y > > config QUOTACTL_COMPAT -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> SUSE Labs, CR ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] quota: fix QUOTACTL kconfig for gfs2 2010-08-12 2:46 ` Jan Kara @ 2010-08-12 15:39 ` Randy Dunlap 2010-08-12 15:57 ` Steven Whitehouse 2010-08-17 10:22 ` Jan Kara 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-08-12 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Kara; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, Steven Whitehouse On 08/11/10 19:46, Jan Kara wrote: > On Wed 11-08-10 16:24:35, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> >> >> warning: (GFS2_FS && BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && (64BIT || LBDAF)) selects QUOTACTL which has unmet direct dependencies (XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA) >> >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> >> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> >> Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com >> --- >> fs/quota/Kconfig | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> However, the "depends on" line here seems like overkill to me. > OK, so do you mean that making QUOTACTL default to 'n', removing the > depends on line and letting QUOTA, XFS_QUOTA, and GFS2_QUOTA select > QUOTACTL would be better? Yes, I think that would be better. However, if you like the patch below, we should also kill the 'select QUOTACTL' in fs/gfs2/Kconfig. >> --- linux-next-20100810.orig/fs/quota/Kconfig >> +++ linux-next-20100810/fs/quota/Kconfig >> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ config QFMT_V2 >> >> config QUOTACTL >> bool >> - depends on XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA >> + depends on XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA || GFS2_FS >> default y >> >> config QUOTACTL_COMPAT -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] quota: fix QUOTACTL kconfig for gfs2 2010-08-12 15:39 ` Randy Dunlap @ 2010-08-12 15:57 ` Steven Whitehouse 2010-08-12 16:03 ` Randy Dunlap 2010-08-17 10:22 ` Jan Kara 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Steven Whitehouse @ 2010-08-12 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-fsdevel, Christoph Hellwig Hi, On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 08:39 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 08/11/10 19:46, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Wed 11-08-10 16:24:35, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> > >> > >> warning: (GFS2_FS && BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && (64BIT || LBDAF)) selects QUOTACTL which has unmet direct dependencies (XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA) > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> > >> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> > >> Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com > >> --- > >> fs/quota/Kconfig | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> However, the "depends on" line here seems like overkill to me. > > OK, so do you mean that making QUOTACTL default to 'n', removing the > > depends on line and letting QUOTA, XFS_QUOTA, and GFS2_QUOTA select > > QUOTACTL would be better? > I'm not sure I follow. What is GFS2_QUOTA in this case? GFS2 used to select QUOTA as well, but Christoph removed that. Shouldn't the user interface part of quota be separate from the core implementation? http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=e9edb1d8a345119c9baafa1b240eb1ec06a44662 Steve. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] quota: fix QUOTACTL kconfig for gfs2 2010-08-12 15:57 ` Steven Whitehouse @ 2010-08-12 16:03 ` Randy Dunlap 2010-08-12 16:14 ` Christoph Hellwig 2010-08-12 16:34 ` Steven Whitehouse 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-08-12 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steven Whitehouse; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-fsdevel, Christoph Hellwig On 08/12/10 08:57, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 08:39 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 08/11/10 19:46, Jan Kara wrote: >>> On Wed 11-08-10 16:24:35, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> >>>> >>>> warning: (GFS2_FS && BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && (64BIT || LBDAF)) selects QUOTACTL which has unmet direct dependencies (XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA) >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> >>>> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> >>>> Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com >>>> --- >>>> fs/quota/Kconfig | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> However, the "depends on" line here seems like overkill to me. >>> OK, so do you mean that making QUOTACTL default to 'n', removing the >>> depends on line and letting QUOTA, XFS_QUOTA, and GFS2_QUOTA select >>> QUOTACTL would be better? >> > I'm not sure I follow. What is GFS2_QUOTA in this case? GFS2 used to That's OK. I'm not following you either. ;) Where is GFS2_QUOTA? > select QUOTA as well, but Christoph removed that. Shouldn't the user > interface part of quota be separate from the core implementation? Do people use one without the other? > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=e9edb1d8a345119c9baafa1b240eb1ec06a44662 Do you prefer my original patch that started this thread? If fs/quota/Kconfig says: config QUOTACTL bool depends on XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA || GFS2_FS default y then there is no need for fs/gfs2/Kconfig to select QUOTACTL. Anyway, this is a centralized kconfig control of QUOTACTL. I was just suggesting that having each fs control is locally would be more manageable. It's not a big deal. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] quota: fix QUOTACTL kconfig for gfs2 2010-08-12 16:03 ` Randy Dunlap @ 2010-08-12 16:14 ` Christoph Hellwig 2010-08-12 16:34 ` Steven Whitehouse 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2010-08-12 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Steven Whitehouse, Jan Kara, linux-fsdevel, Christoph Hellwig On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:03:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > select QUOTA as well, but Christoph removed that. Shouldn't the user > > interface part of quota be separate from the core implementation? > > Do people use one without the other? Yes, there's a the quoatctl system call and a few handlers, of which the current quota implementation is different. We currently have the semi-generionc 'dquot' implementation used by extN, reiserfs and ocfs2, the xfs implementation and the gfs2 implementation. We also used to have some stubs in cifs, but they never became an actually useful implementation. So selecting QUOTACTL by XFS, GFS2 and QUOTA (which is a bit misnamed) would be correct. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] quota: fix QUOTACTL kconfig for gfs2 2010-08-12 16:03 ` Randy Dunlap 2010-08-12 16:14 ` Christoph Hellwig @ 2010-08-12 16:34 ` Steven Whitehouse 2010-08-12 16:41 ` Randy Dunlap 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Steven Whitehouse @ 2010-08-12 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-fsdevel, Christoph Hellwig Hi, On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 09:03 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 08/12/10 08:57, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 08:39 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 08/11/10 19:46, Jan Kara wrote: > >>> On Wed 11-08-10 16:24:35, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >>>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> > >>>> > >>>> warning: (GFS2_FS && BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && (64BIT || LBDAF)) selects QUOTACTL which has unmet direct dependencies (XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA) > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> > >>>> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> > >>>> Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com > >>>> --- > >>>> fs/quota/Kconfig | 2 +- > >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>>> > >>>> However, the "depends on" line here seems like overkill to me. > >>> OK, so do you mean that making QUOTACTL default to 'n', removing the > >>> depends on line and letting QUOTA, XFS_QUOTA, and GFS2_QUOTA select > >>> QUOTACTL would be better? > >> > > I'm not sure I follow. What is GFS2_QUOTA in this case? GFS2 used to > > That's OK. I'm not following you either. ;) Where is GFS2_QUOTA? > Well GFS2_QUOTA was referred to in the above comment, but it doesn't exist as quotas are not optional in GFS2. That is partly a hangover from GFS1 and partly because it makes things a lot more complicated in a cluster filesystem if you can't be sure that all nodes understand the same options. > > > select QUOTA as well, but Christoph removed that. Shouldn't the user > > interface part of quota be separate from the core implementation? > > Do people use one without the other? > The original GFS2 implementation was totally separate, again it was largely inherited from GFS1, but some changes (read/write of the quota file via the gfs2meta fs type, rather than the GFS1 read/write ioctls). More recently I added support for updating the quotas via the XFS-style interface with the longer term aim of being able to use quota-tools for all GFS2 quota operations and (eventually) dropping support for the gfs2_quota tool. As a result of that GFS2 uses the quotactl interface code, but retains all its original, internal, quota code as well. > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=e9edb1d8a345119c9baafa1b240eb1ec06a44662 > > Do you prefer my original patch that started this thread? > > If fs/quota/Kconfig says: > > config QUOTACTL > bool > depends on XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA || GFS2_FS > default y > > then there is no need for fs/gfs2/Kconfig to select QUOTACTL. > > > Anyway, this is a centralized kconfig control of QUOTACTL. I was just suggesting > that having each fs control is locally would be more manageable. It's not a big deal. > Hmm. I'd been looking on the quotactl code as basically being a library function, so I'd have expected to have the filesystems select it if they require it. I thought the original issue was that there was some interdependency between QUOTA and QUOTACTL or is that not what that message was saying? Steve. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] quota: fix QUOTACTL kconfig for gfs2 2010-08-12 16:34 ` Steven Whitehouse @ 2010-08-12 16:41 ` Randy Dunlap 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-08-12 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steven Whitehouse; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-fsdevel, Christoph Hellwig On 08/12/10 09:34, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 09:03 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 08/12/10 08:57, Steven Whitehouse wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 08:39 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>> On 08/11/10 19:46, Jan Kara wrote: >>>>> On Wed 11-08-10 16:24:35, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>>>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> warning: (GFS2_FS && BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && (64BIT || LBDAF)) selects QUOTACTL which has unmet direct dependencies (XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA) >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> >>>>>> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> >>>>>> Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com >>>>>> --- >>>>>> fs/quota/Kconfig | 2 +- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> However, the "depends on" line here seems like overkill to me. >>>>> OK, so do you mean that making QUOTACTL default to 'n', removing the >>>>> depends on line and letting QUOTA, XFS_QUOTA, and GFS2_QUOTA select >>>>> QUOTACTL would be better? >>>> >>> I'm not sure I follow. What is GFS2_QUOTA in this case? GFS2 used to >> >> That's OK. I'm not following you either. ;) Where is GFS2_QUOTA? >> > Well GFS2_QUOTA was referred to in the above comment, but it doesn't Oh, in Jan's comment. I see. > exist as quotas are not optional in GFS2. That is partly a hangover from > GFS1 and partly because it makes things a lot more complicated in a > cluster filesystem if you can't be sure that all nodes understand the > same options. > >> >>> select QUOTA as well, but Christoph removed that. Shouldn't the user >>> interface part of quota be separate from the core implementation? >> >> Do people use one without the other? >> > The original GFS2 implementation was totally separate, again it was > largely inherited from GFS1, but some changes (read/write of the quota > file via the gfs2meta fs type, rather than the GFS1 read/write ioctls). > More recently I added support for updating the quotas via the XFS-style > interface with the longer term aim of being able to use quota-tools for > all GFS2 quota operations and (eventually) dropping support for the > gfs2_quota tool. > > As a result of that GFS2 uses the quotactl interface code, but retains > all its original, internal, quota code as well. > >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=e9edb1d8a345119c9baafa1b240eb1ec06a44662 >> >> Do you prefer my original patch that started this thread? >> >> If fs/quota/Kconfig says: >> >> config QUOTACTL >> bool >> depends on XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA || GFS2_FS >> default y >> >> then there is no need for fs/gfs2/Kconfig to select QUOTACTL. >> >> >> Anyway, this is a centralized kconfig control of QUOTACTL. I was just suggesting >> that having each fs control is locally would be more manageable. It's not a big deal. >> > Hmm. I'd been looking on the quotactl code as basically being a library > function, so I'd have expected to have the filesystems select it if they > require it. Yes, that's how I see it also, but Jan can correct me on that... > I thought the original issue was that there was some interdependency > between QUOTA and QUOTACTL or is that not what that message was saying? I don't think so. It's just a Kconfig language muckup & cleanup AFAICT. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] quota: fix QUOTACTL kconfig for gfs2 2010-08-12 15:39 ` Randy Dunlap 2010-08-12 15:57 ` Steven Whitehouse @ 2010-08-17 10:22 ` Jan Kara 2010-08-17 15:03 ` Randy Dunlap 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jan Kara @ 2010-08-17 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-fsdevel, Steven Whitehouse On Thu 12-08-10 08:39:45, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 08/11/10 19:46, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Wed 11-08-10 16:24:35, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> > >> > >> warning: (GFS2_FS && BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && (64BIT || LBDAF)) selects QUOTACTL which has unmet direct dependencies (XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA) > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> > >> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> > >> Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com > >> --- > >> fs/quota/Kconfig | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> However, the "depends on" line here seems like overkill to me. > > OK, so do you mean that making QUOTACTL default to 'n', removing the > > depends on line and letting QUOTA, XFS_QUOTA, and GFS2_QUOTA select > > QUOTACTL would be better? > > Yes, I think that would be better. OK, I've pushed the patch below to my tree. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> SUSE Labs, CR --- >From 7d67aa08b438d5c1681a2e977f8e3f2e44570305 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:14:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] quota: Make QUOTACTL config be selected by its users Remove "depends on" line from QUOTACTL config option and rather select the option explicitely from config options which need it. It makes more sense this way and also fixes Kconfig warning due to GFS2 selecting QUOTACTL but QUOTACTL not depending on it. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> --- fs/quota/Kconfig | 4 ++-- fs/xfs/Kconfig | 1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/quota/Kconfig b/fs/quota/Kconfig index 3e21b1e..880fd98 100644 --- a/fs/quota/Kconfig +++ b/fs/quota/Kconfig @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ config QUOTA bool "Quota support" + select QUOTACTL help If you say Y here, you will be able to set per user limits for disk usage (also called disk quotas). Currently, it works for the @@ -65,8 +66,7 @@ config QFMT_V2 config QUOTACTL bool - depends on XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA - default y + default n config QUOTACTL_COMPAT bool diff --git a/fs/xfs/Kconfig b/fs/xfs/Kconfig index 480f281..6100ec0 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/Kconfig +++ b/fs/xfs/Kconfig @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ config XFS_FS config XFS_QUOTA bool "XFS Quota support" depends on XFS_FS + select QUOTACTL help If you say Y here, you will be able to set limits for disk usage on a per user and/or a per group basis under XFS. XFS considers quota -- 1.6.4.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] quota: fix QUOTACTL kconfig for gfs2 2010-08-17 10:22 ` Jan Kara @ 2010-08-17 15:03 ` Randy Dunlap 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-08-17 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Kara; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, Steven Whitehouse On 08/17/10 03:22, Jan Kara wrote: > On Thu 12-08-10 08:39:45, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 08/11/10 19:46, Jan Kara wrote: >>> On Wed 11-08-10 16:24:35, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> >>>> >>>> warning: (GFS2_FS && BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && (64BIT || LBDAF)) selects QUOTACTL which has unmet direct dependencies (XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA) >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> >>>> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> >>>> Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com >>>> --- >>>> fs/quota/Kconfig | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> However, the "depends on" line here seems like overkill to me. >>> OK, so do you mean that making QUOTACTL default to 'n', removing the >>> depends on line and letting QUOTA, XFS_QUOTA, and GFS2_QUOTA select >>> QUOTACTL would be better? >> >> Yes, I think that would be better. > OK, I've pushed the patch below to my tree. Thanks. Looks good. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-17 15:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-08-11 23:24 [PATCH -next] quota: fix QUOTACTL kconfig for gfs2 Randy Dunlap 2010-08-12 2:46 ` Jan Kara 2010-08-12 15:39 ` Randy Dunlap 2010-08-12 15:57 ` Steven Whitehouse 2010-08-12 16:03 ` Randy Dunlap 2010-08-12 16:14 ` Christoph Hellwig 2010-08-12 16:34 ` Steven Whitehouse 2010-08-12 16:41 ` Randy Dunlap 2010-08-17 10:22 ` Jan Kara 2010-08-17 15:03 ` Randy Dunlap
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).