From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] rados block device and ceph refactor Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:37:06 -0700 Message-ID: <20100813153706.ee61c94e.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <1281721240-26130-1-git-send-email-sage@newdream.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, yehuda@hq.newdream.net To: Sage Weil Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1281721240-26130-1-git-send-email-sage@newdream.net> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:40:32 -0700 Sage Weil wrote: > Hi, > > The rados block device (rbd) implements a network block device backed by > the Ceph distributed object store (think nbd/iSCSI, but distributed and > fault tolerant). At the suggestion of Christoph and James, this version > of the patchset factors out the common Ceph bits (the network protocol, > cluster membership, and object storage parts) into a libceph module > (currently in net/ceph/ and include/linux/ceph/) that is shared by the > file system component (fs/ceph) and rbd (drivers/block/rbd.c). The first > few patches lay some groundwork, #7 moves does the ceph -> libceph+ceph > split, and #8 adds the block device driver. Hi, Did patch #7 make it to any mailing lists? I didn't receive it. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***