From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Proposal: Use hi-res clock for file timestamps Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:29:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20100817182920.GD18161@basil.fritz.box> References: <87aaolwar8.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20100817174134.GA23176@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , "Patrick J. LoPresti" , linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100817174134.GA23176-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org > OK, so that leaves us with the race, even on newer filesystems: > > 1. File is modified, mtime updated > 2. Client fetches mtime to revalidate cache > 3. File is modified again, mtime updated > 4. Client fetches new mtime to revalidate cache You'll always have a race window with time, the only way around that would be a version number. > - Tell everyone to use NFSv4 (and make sure we have > changeattr/i_version working correctly). > - Use a finer-grained time source. (I believe you when you say > the TSC is too slow, but maybe we should run some tests to > make sure.) It depends on the CPU too. > - Increment mtime by a nanosecond when necessary. You cannot be more precise than the backing file system: this causes non monotonity when the inodes are flushed (has happened in the past) -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html