From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Becker Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] replace barriers with explicit flush / FUA usage Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 03:35:42 -0700 Message-ID: <20100818103542.GB9873@mail.oracle.com> References: <20100818093432.646633424@bombadil.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: tj@kernel.org, chris.mason@oracle.com, swhiteho@redhat.com, konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp, tytso@mit.edu, jack@suse.cz, hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp, mfasheh@suse.com, hughd@google.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:53965 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751192Ab0HRKhZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:37:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100818093432.646633424@bombadil.infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:29:08AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This series converts over all filesystems to the new WRITE_FLUSH_FUA > primitive that Tejun added. XFS, btrfs, gfs2, reiserfs, ext3 and ext4 > have passed extensive xfstests coverage with this, while ocfs2, nilfs2 > and fat are unsupposed by xfstests and thus untested in this patch. What does it take to get ocfs2 supported by xfstests? Joel -- "But then she looks me in the eye And says, 'We're going to last forever,' And man you know I can't begin to doubt it. Cause it just feels so good and so free and so right, I know we ain't never going to change our minds about it, Hey! Here comes my girl." Joel Becker Consulting Software Developer Oracle E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com Phone: (650) 506-8127