From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
jaxboe@fusionio.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@suse.de, tytso@mit.edu, chris.mason@oracle.com,
swhiteho@redhat.com, konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp,
dm-devel@redhat.com, vst@vlnb.net, jack@suse.cz,
rwheeler@redhat.com, hare@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET block#for-2.6.36-post] block: replace barrier with sequenced flush
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:20:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100819102023.GA6736@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C6D0021.4040601@kernel.org>
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:57:53AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 08/18/2010 11:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > FYI: One issue with this series is that make_request based drivers
> > not have to access all REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA requests. We'll either
> > need to add handling to empty REQ_FLUSH requests to all of them or
> > figure out a way to prevent them getting sent. That is assuming they'll
> > simply ignore REQ_FLUSH/REQ_FUA on normal writes.
>
> Can you be a bit more specific? In most cases, request based drivers
> should be fine. They sit behind the front most request_queue which
> would discompose REQ_FLUSH/FUAs into appropriate command sequence.
I said make_request based drivers, that is drivers taking bios. These
get bios directly from __generic_make_request and need to deal with
REQ_FLUSH/FUA themselves. We have quite a few more than just dm/md of
this kind:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c: blk_queue_make_request(bank->disk->queue, axon_ram_make_request);
drivers/block/aoe/aoeblk.c: blk_queue_make_request(d->blkq, aoeblk_make_request);
drivers/block/brd.c: blk_queue_make_request(brd->brd_queue, brd_make_request);
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c: blk_queue_make_request(q, drbd_make_request_26);
drivers/block/loop.c: blk_queue_make_request(lo->lo_queue, loop_make_request);
drivers/block/pktcdvd.c: blk_queue_make_request(q, pkt_make_request);
drivers/block/ps3vram.c: blk_queue_make_request(queue, ps3vram_make_request);
drivers/block/umem.c: blk_queue_make_request(card->queue, mm_make_request);
drivers/s390/block/dcssblk.c: blk_queue_make_request(dev_info->dcssblk_queue, dcssblk_make_request);
drivers/s390/block/xpram.c: blk_queue_make_request(xpram_queues[i], xpram_make_request);
drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:blk_queue_make_request(zram->queue, zram_make_request);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-19 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-12 12:41 [PATCHSET block#for-2.6.36-post] block: replace barrier with sequenced flush Tejun Heo
2010-08-12 12:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] block/loop: queue ordered mode should be DRAIN_FLUSH Tejun Heo
2010-08-12 12:41 ` [PATCH 02/11] block: kill QUEUE_ORDERED_BY_TAG Tejun Heo
2010-08-13 12:56 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2010-08-13 13:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-12 12:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: deprecate barrier and replace blk_queue_ordered() with blk_queue_flush() Tejun Heo
2010-08-14 1:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-14 9:42 ` hch
2010-08-16 20:38 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-12 12:41 ` [PATCH 04/11] block: remove spurious uses of REQ_HARDBARRIER Tejun Heo
2010-08-12 12:41 ` [PATCH 05/11] block: misc cleanups in barrier code Tejun Heo
2010-08-12 12:41 ` [PATCH 06/11] block: drop barrier ordering by queue draining Tejun Heo
2010-08-12 12:41 ` [PATCH 07/11] block: rename blk-barrier.c to blk-flush.c Tejun Heo
2010-08-12 12:41 ` [PATCH 08/11] block: rename barrier/ordered to flush Tejun Heo
2010-08-17 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-17 16:23 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-17 17:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-18 6:23 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-12 12:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] block: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA based interface for FLUSH/FUA requests Tejun Heo
2010-08-12 12:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] fs, block: propagate REQ_FLUSH/FUA interface to upper layers Tejun Heo
2010-08-12 21:24 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-13 7:19 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-13 7:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-16 16:33 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-08-12 12:41 ` [PATCH 11/11] block: use REQ_FLUSH in blkdev_issue_flush() Tejun Heo
2010-08-13 11:48 ` [PATCHSET block#for-2.6.36-post] block: replace barrier with sequenced flush Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-13 13:48 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-13 14:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-13 14:51 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-14 10:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-17 9:59 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-17 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-17 16:41 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-17 16:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-18 6:35 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-18 8:11 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-20 8:26 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-08-23 12:14 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-23 14:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-24 10:24 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-08-24 16:59 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-24 17:52 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-24 18:14 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 8:00 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-08-25 15:28 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-27 9:47 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-08-27 13:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-30 6:13 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-09-01 0:55 ` safety of retrying SYNCHRONIZE CACHE [was: Re: [PATCHSET block#for-2.6.36-post] block: replace barrier with sequenced flush] Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01 7:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-09-01 7:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-08-25 15:59 ` [RFC] training mpath to discern between SCSI errors (was: Re: [PATCHSET block#for-2.6.36-post] block: replace barrier with sequenced flush) Mike Snitzer
2010-08-25 19:15 ` [RFC] training mpath to discern between SCSI errors Mike Christie
2010-08-30 11:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-08-30 12:07 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-08-30 12:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-08-30 14:52 ` [dm-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2010-10-18 8:09 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2010-10-18 11:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-10-19 4:03 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2010-11-19 3:11 ` [dm-devel] " Malahal Naineni
2010-11-30 22:59 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-12-07 23:16 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] differentiate between I/O errors Mike Snitzer
2010-12-07 23:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] scsi: Detailed " Mike Snitzer
2010-12-07 23:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] dm mpath: propagate target errors immediately Mike Snitzer
2010-12-07 23:16 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] block: improve detail in I/O error messages Mike Snitzer
2010-12-08 11:28 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-12-08 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 " Mike Snitzer
2010-12-10 23:40 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] differentiate between I/O errors Malahal Naineni
2011-01-14 1:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-12-17 9:47 ` training mpath to discern between SCSI errors Hannes Reinecke
2010-12-17 14:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-14 1:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-14 7:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-01-14 13:59 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-24 17:11 ` [PATCHSET block#for-2.6.36-post] block: replace barrier with sequenced flush Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2010-08-24 23:14 ` Alan Cox
2010-08-13 12:55 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2010-08-13 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-18 19:29 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2010-08-13 13:21 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-18 19:30 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2010-08-19 9:51 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 9:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-08-30 20:34 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2010-08-18 9:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-19 9:57 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-19 10:20 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-08-19 10:22 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-20 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-20 15:18 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-08-20 16:00 ` Chris Mason
2010-08-20 16:02 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-08-23 12:30 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-23 12:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-23 13:58 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-08-23 14:01 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-23 14:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-23 14:13 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-23 14:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-25 11:31 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-30 10:04 ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-08-23 15:19 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-08-23 16:45 ` Sergey Vlasov
2010-08-23 16:49 ` [dm-devel] " Ric Wheeler
2010-08-23 12:36 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-23 14:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-23 14:15 ` [PATCH] block: simplify queue_next_fseq Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-23 16:28 ` OT grammar nit " John Robinson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100819102023.GA6736@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vst@vlnb.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).