From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] nilfs2: remove own inode hash table Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 04:30:28 -0400 Message-ID: <20100824083027.GA27594@infradead.org> References: <1282471506-29618-1-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20100824074844.GH3948@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ryusuke Konishi , linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Al Viro , linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Nick Piggin Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100824074844.GH3948@amd> Sender: linux-nilfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:48:44PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > The reason I broke nilfs2 is because it duplicates a lot of the > generic inode initialisation code. This really should go in core > code because nilfs2 does not own the generic inode fields. > > It just needs some helper function to do the non-sb related init > stuff for you. No, the problem is much deeper than that. Having inodes outlive superblock is fundamentally broken. All that crap simply needs to go away. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html