From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] nilfs2: remove own inode hash table Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:32:14 -0400 Message-ID: <20100824153214.GA25897@infradead.org> References: <1282471506-29618-1-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20100824074844.GH3948@amd> <20100824083027.GA27594@infradead.org> <20100824.215823.121933465.ryusuke@osrg.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org, npiggin-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org, konishi.ryusuke-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org, linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ryusuke Konishi Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100824.215823.121933465.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nilfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:58:23PM +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > Actually, I recently wrote a patchset to unify all super block > instances on one device into one sb, which makes the inodes outlive > superblock eliminable. Yes, that's how we handle things everywhere, including btrfs with it's subvolumes and snapshots. > But the patchset has a problem that it cannot shrink a number of > versions of namespace when unmounting all snapshots and a current time > instance. Can you explain the issue in more detail? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html