linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@tuxdriver.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] core_pattern: fix long parameters was truncated by core_pattern handler
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:47:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100824154745.779ed12b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282642966-2296-1-git-send-email-dfeng@redhat.com>

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:42:46 +0800
Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com> wrote:

> We met a parameter truncated issue, consider following:
> > > echo "|/root/core_pattern_pipe_test %p /usr/libexec/blah-blah-blah \
> %s %c %p %u %g 11 12345678901234567890123456789012345678 %t" > \
> /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
> 
> This is okay because the strings is less than CORENAME_MAX_SIZE.
> "cat /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern" shows the whole string. but
> after we run core_pattern_pipe_test in man page, we found last
> parameter was truncated like below:
>         argc[10]=<12807486>
> 
> The root cause is core_pattern allows % specifiers, which need to be
> replaced during parse time, but the replace may expand the strings
> to larger than CORENAME_MAX_SIZE. So if the last parameter is %
> specifiers, the replace code is using snprintf(out_ptr, out_end - out_ptr, ...),
> this will write out of corename array.
> 
> Changes since v3:
> make handling of single char also uses cn_printf, suggested by Andrew Morton.
> 
> Changes since v2:
> Introduced generic function cn_printf and make format_corename remember the time
> has been expanded, suggested by Olg Nesterov and Neil Horman.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> This patch allocates corename at runtime, if the replace doesn't have enough
> memory, expand the corename dynamically, suggested by Neil Horman.
> 
> I've tested with some core_pattern strings, it works fine now.

cool, thanks.

> 
> ...
>
> -static int format_corename(char *corename, long signr)
> +static int format_corename(struct core_name *cn, long signr)
>  {
>  	const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
>  	const char *pat_ptr = core_pattern;
>  	int ispipe = (*pat_ptr == '|');
> -	char *out_ptr = corename;
> -	char *const out_end = corename + CORENAME_MAX_SIZE;
> -	int rc;
>  	int pid_in_pattern = 0;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	cn->size = CORENAME_MAX_SIZE * atomic_read(&call_count);
> +	cn->corename = kmalloc(cn->size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	cn->used = 0;
> +
> +	if (!cn->corename)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	/* Repeat as long as we have more pattern to process and more output
>  	   space */
>  	while (*pat_ptr) {
>  		if (*pat_ptr != '%') {
> -			if (out_ptr == out_end)
> -				goto out;
> -			*out_ptr++ = *pat_ptr++;
> +			err = cn_printf(cn, "%c", *pat_ptr++);
>  		} else {
>  			switch (*++pat_ptr) {
> +			/* single % at the end, drop that */
>  			case 0:
> +				err = cn_printf(cn, "%c", '\0');

Confused.  Doesn't this bit just add another \0 to the end of an
already-null-terminated string?  And then make cn->used get out of sync
with strlen(cn->corename)?


  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-24 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-29 12:42 [RFC PATCH] core_pattern: fix long parameters was truncated by core_pattern handler Xiaotian Feng
2010-07-29 13:31 ` Neil Horman
2010-08-02 12:23   ` [RFC PATCH V2] " Xiaotian Feng
2010-08-02 13:50     ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-08-03 10:59       ` Neil Horman
2010-08-20  9:22         ` [RFC PATCH v3] " Xiaotian Feng
2010-08-20  9:35           ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-08-20  9:35         ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-08-23 11:07           ` Neil Horman
2010-08-23 23:02             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-23 21:18           ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-24  6:18             ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-08-24  6:28               ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-24  9:42             ` [PATCH v4] " Xiaotian Feng
2010-08-24 22:47               ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-08-25  1:58                 ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-08-25  2:17                 ` [PATCH v5] " Xiaotian Feng
2010-08-02 14:30     ` [RFC PATCH V2] " Denys Vlasenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100824154745.779ed12b.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dfeng@redhat.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).