linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Do not wait the full timeout on congestion_wait when there is no congestion
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:38:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100827093825.GF19556@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100827012147.GC7353@localhost>

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:21:47AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Minchan,
> 
> It's much cleaner to keep the unchanged congestion_wait() and add a
> congestion_wait_check() for converting problematic wait sites. The
> too_many_isolated() wait is merely a protective mechanism, I won't
> bother to improve it at the cost of more code.
> 

This is what I've done. I dropped the patch again and am using
wait_iff_congested(). I left the too_many_isolated() callers as
congestion_wait().

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-27  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-26 15:14 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Do not wait the full timeout on congestion_wait when there is no congestion Mel Gorman
2010-08-26 15:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] writeback: Account for time spent congestion_waited Mel Gorman
2010-08-26 17:23   ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-26 18:10   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-08-26 15:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] writeback: Record if the congestion was unnecessary Mel Gorman
2010-08-26 17:35   ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-26 17:41     ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-26 18:29   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-08-26 20:31     ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-27  2:12       ` Shaohua Li
2010-08-27  9:20         ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-27  8:16       ` Johannes Weiner
2010-08-27  9:24         ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-30 13:19           ` Johannes Weiner
2010-08-31 15:02             ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-02 15:49               ` Johannes Weiner
2010-09-02 18:28                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-29 16:03     ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-26 15:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] writeback: Do not congestion sleep when there are no congested BDIs Mel Gorman
2010-08-26 17:38   ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-26 17:42     ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-26 18:17       ` Johannes Weiner
2010-08-26 20:23         ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-27  1:11           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-27  9:34             ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-27  1:42         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-27  9:37           ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-27  5:13   ` Dave Chinner
2010-08-27  9:33     ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-26 17:20 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Do not wait the full timeout on congestion_wait when there is no congestion Minchan Kim
2010-08-26 17:31   ` Mel Gorman
2010-08-26 17:50     ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-27  1:21   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-27  1:41     ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-27  1:50       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-27  2:02         ` Minchan Kim
2010-08-27  4:34           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-27  9:38     ` Mel Gorman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100827093825.GF19556@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).