linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@redhat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jblunck@suse.de, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:29:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100831192919.GB5759@shell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Oq1RL-0003zF-Tw@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:18:11PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Neil Brown wrote:
> 
> > My comment about set-theory unions being commutative set me thinking.  I
> > really don't think "union" is the right name for this thing.  There is
> > nothing about it which really fits that proper definition of a union.
> > whiteouts mean that even the list of names in a directory is not the union of
> > the lists of names in the upper and lower directories.
> > "overlay" is a much more accurate name.  But union seems to be the name
> > that is most used.  I wonder if it is too late to change that.
> 
> We could call it overlayfs.  People learn new names quickly :)

Union mounts was named "writable overlays" for one release in an
attempt to get away from the "arbitrary union of file systems" idea.
I think it helped, but went back to union mounts since it was more
familiar and made prettier function names.

The config option for union mounts says:

Union mounts allow you to mount a transparent writable layer over a
read-only file system, for example, an ext3 partition on a hard drive
over a CD-ROM root file system image.

-VAL

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-31 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-26 18:33 [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype Miklos Szeredi
2010-08-26 18:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] vfs: implement open "forwarding" Miklos Szeredi
2010-08-26 18:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] vfs: make i_op->permission take a dentry instead of an inode Miklos Szeredi
2010-08-26 20:24   ` David P. Quigley
2010-08-27  4:11     ` Neil Brown
2010-08-27 18:13       ` David P. Quigley
2010-08-27 19:21         ` Valerie Aurora
2010-08-27 18:31       ` David P. Quigley
2010-08-26 18:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] vfs: add flag to allow rename to same inode Miklos Szeredi
2010-08-26 18:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] vfs: export do_splice_direct() to modules Miklos Szeredi
2010-08-26 18:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] union: hybrid union filesystem prototype Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-01 21:42   ` Valerie Aurora
2010-09-02  9:19     ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-02 21:33       ` Valerie Aurora
2010-09-03  5:10         ` Neil Brown
2010-09-03  9:16           ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-09 16:02             ` David P. Quigley
2010-09-03  8:52         ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-02 21:42   ` Valerie Aurora
2010-09-03 12:31     ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-08-27  7:05 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Neil Brown
2010-08-27  8:47   ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-08-27 11:35     ` Neil Brown
2010-08-27 16:53       ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-08-29  4:42         ` Neil Brown
2010-08-30 10:18           ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-08-30 11:40             ` Neil Brown
2010-08-30 12:20               ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-08-31 19:18                 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-08-31 20:19                   ` Trond Myklebust
2010-09-01  1:56                     ` Valerie Aurora
2010-09-01  4:04                       ` Trond Myklebust
2010-09-01  4:33               ` Neil Brown
2010-09-01 20:11                 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-08-31 19:29             ` Valerie Aurora [this message]
2010-09-02 13:15             ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-02 13:32               ` Neil Brown
2010-09-02 14:25                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-02 14:28                   ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-09-08 19:47                     ` David P. Quigley
2010-09-23 13:18                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-09-23 19:22                     ` Valerie Aurora
2010-08-30 18:38       ` Valerie Aurora
2010-08-30 23:12         ` Neil Brown
2010-08-31 11:00           ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-08-31 11:24             ` Neil Brown
2010-08-31 15:05               ` Kyle Moffett
2010-08-31 20:36                 ` Valerie Aurora

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100831192919.GB5759@shell \
    --to=vaurora@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jblunck@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).