From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Minchan Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page() Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 00:28:40 +0900 Message-ID: <20100907152840.GD4620@barrios-desktop> References: <1283770053-18833-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <1283770053-18833-6-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel List , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , Wu Fengguang , Andrea Arcangeli , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , KOSAKI Motohiro , Dave Chinner , Chris Mason , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton To: Mel Gorman Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1283770053-18833-6-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:47:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > From: KOSAKI Motohiro > > With synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to reclaim > pages even if page is locked. This patch uses lock_page() instead of > trylock_page() in this case. > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org