From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: Do not return ERESTARTSYS as a result of AIO (v2)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 23:53:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100909215303.GB3281@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49tyly8zpc.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
On Thu 09-09-10 15:49:19, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:
>
> > OCFS2 can return ERESTARTSYS from its write function when the process is
> > signalled while waiting for a cluster lock (and the filesystem is mounted with
> > intr mount option). Generally, it seems reasonable to allow filesystems to
> > return this error code from its IO functions. As we must not leak ERESTARTSYS
> > (and similar error codes) to userspace as a result of an AIO operation, we
> > have to properly convert it to EINTR inside AIO code (restarting the syscall
> > isn't really an option because other AIO could have been already submitted by
> > the same io_submit syscall).
>
> I had responded to your last posting with:
>
> This is a confusing problem description. First, I'm assuming you
> actually experienced this, is that right? Care to share the details of
> that?
>
> The above paragraph I think you addressed. I'm still curious about
> this, though. The submission path should be as non-blocking as
> possible. I guess you can't really get around locking, though. Was the
> problem witnessed when doing O_DIRECT or buffered AIO?
>
> Next, assuming we can get ERSTARTSYS and friends, it will be the return
> code of a single iocb (reaped via io_getevents), not the return code of
> the io_submit system call. I'm not saying this is right, I'm just
> saying that your description of the problem is misleading.
>
> That objection stands, but just warrants correcting the problem description.
Hmm, I tried to address that by saying:
As we must not leak ERESTARTSYS (and similar error codes) to userspace
as a result of an AIO operation
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
by which I meant the result value in the iocb structure. But apparently
it's not explicit enough. So would you be happier with something like
"result received via io_getevents() syscall"?
> Anyway, the code itself looks fine. ;-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Thanks.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-09 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-09 19:36 [PATCH] aio: Do not return ERESTARTSYS as a result of AIO (v2) Jan Kara
2010-09-09 19:49 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-09-09 21:53 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2010-09-10 15:13 ` Jeff Moyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100909215303.GB3281@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).