linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: Do not return ERESTARTSYS as a result of AIO (v2)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 23:53:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100909215303.GB3281@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49tyly8zpc.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

On Thu 09-09-10 15:49:19, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:
> 
> > OCFS2 can return ERESTARTSYS from its write function when the process is
> > signalled while waiting for a cluster lock (and the filesystem is mounted with
> > intr mount option). Generally, it seems reasonable to allow filesystems to
> > return this error code from its IO functions. As we must not leak ERESTARTSYS
> > (and similar error codes) to userspace as a result of an AIO operation, we
> > have to properly convert it to EINTR inside AIO code (restarting the syscall
> > isn't really an option because other AIO could have been already submitted by
> > the same io_submit syscall).
> 
> I had responded to your last posting with:
> 
>   This is a confusing problem description.  First, I'm assuming you
>   actually experienced this, is that right?  Care to share the details of
>   that?
> 
> The above paragraph I think you addressed.  I'm still curious about
> this, though.  The submission path should be as non-blocking as
> possible.  I guess you can't really get around locking, though.  Was the
> problem witnessed when doing O_DIRECT or buffered AIO?
> 
>   Next, assuming we can get ERSTARTSYS and friends, it will be the return
>   code of a single iocb (reaped via io_getevents), not the return code of
>   the io_submit system call.  I'm not saying this is right, I'm just
>   saying that your description of the problem is misleading.
> 
> That objection stands, but just warrants correcting the problem description.
  Hmm, I tried to address that by saying:

As we must not leak ERESTARTSYS (and similar error codes) to userspace
as a result of an AIO operation
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
by which I meant the result value in the iocb structure. But apparently
it's not explicit enough. So would you be happier with something like
"result received via io_getevents() syscall"?

> Anyway, the code itself looks fine.  ;-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
  Thanks.

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-09 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-09 19:36 [PATCH] aio: Do not return ERESTARTSYS as a result of AIO (v2) Jan Kara
2010-09-09 19:49 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-09-09 21:53   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2010-09-10 15:13     ` Jeff Moyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100909215303.GB3281@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).