From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:32:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20100917133231.GA9411@infradead.org> References: <201009161632.59210.arnd@arndb.de> <20100916150459.GA8437@quack.suse.cz> <16843727-8A3D-48FF-9021-E0AD99C23E18@cam.ac.uk> <201009171245.41930.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Anton Altaparmakov , Jan Kara , codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, autofs@linux.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Christoph Hellwig , Mikulas Patocka , Trond Myklebust , Petr Vandrovec , Anders Larsen , Evgeniy Dushistov , Ingo Molnar , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Hendry To: Arnd Bergmann Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201009171245.41930.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:45:41PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > ncpfs: replace BKL with lock_super Err, no. lock_super is just as much on it's way out as the BKL. We've managed to move it down from the VFS into a few remaining filesystems and now need to get rid of those users. Please don't add any new ones.