linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, zippel@linux-m68k.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] hfsplus: use alloc_mutex in hfsplus_sync_fs
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:20:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100926212034.GE6394@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100926211920.GA6394@lst.de>

Use alloc_mutex to protect hfsplus_sync_fs against itself and concurrent
allocations, which allows to get rid of lock_super in hfsplus.

Note that most fields in the superblock still aren't protected against
concurrent allocations, that will follow later.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>

Index: linux-2.6/fs/hfsplus/super.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/hfsplus/super.c	2010-09-27 05:25:07.450327791 +0900
+++ linux-2.6/fs/hfsplus/super.c	2010-09-27 05:26:11.439327789 +0900
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ int hfsplus_sync_fs(struct super_block *
 
 	dprint(DBG_SUPER, "hfsplus_write_super\n");
 
-	lock_super(sb);
+	mutex_lock(&HFSPLUS_SB(sb).alloc_mutex);
 	sb->s_dirt = 0;
 
 	vhdr->free_blocks = cpu_to_be32(HFSPLUS_SB(sb).free_blocks);
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ int hfsplus_sync_fs(struct super_block *
 		}
 		HFSPLUS_SB(sb).flags &= ~HFSPLUS_SB_WRITEBACKUP;
 	}
-	unlock_super(sb);
+	mutex_unlock(&HFSPLUS_SB(sb).alloc_mutex);
 	return 0;
 }
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-26 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-26 21:19 [PATCH 1/6] hfsplus: fix BKL leak in hfsplus_ioctl Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-26 21:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] hfsplus: split hfsplus_ioctl Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-26 21:20 ` [PATCH 3/6] hfsplus: protect setflags using i_mutex Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-26 21:20 ` [PATCH 4/6] hfsplus: introduce alloc_mutex Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-26 21:20 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-09-26 21:20 ` [PATCH 5/6] hfsplus: remove BKL from hfsplus_put_super Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100926212034.GE6394@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).