From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] fs: icache lock inode hash Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:52:20 -0700 Message-ID: <20100929215220.8b5f3910.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1285762729-17928-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1285762729-17928-4-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:43472 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751702Ab0I3EvQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:51:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1285762729-17928-4-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:18:35 +1000 Dave Chinner wrote: > DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inode_lock); > DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sb_inode_list_lock); > +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inode_hash_lock); I assume these all go away later on. If not, they'll probably all land in the same cacheline!