From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] fs: icache remove inode_lock
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:09:41 +1100
Message-ID: <20101008080941.GZ4681@dastard>
References: <1286515292-15882-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
 <1286515292-15882-18-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
 <20101008080319.GC30902@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101008080319.GC30902@infradead.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:03:19AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:21:31PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > 
> > All the functionality that the inode_lock protected has now been
> > wrapped up in new independent locks and/or functionality. Hence the
> > inode_lock does not serve a purpose any longer and hence can now be
> > removed.
> 
> Might be worth mentioning this also updates the locking / lock order
> documenation all over the place.

Ok.

> 
> > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/Locking
> > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/Locking
> > @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ alloc_inode:
> >  destroy_inode:
> >  dirty_inode:				(must not sleep)
> >  write_inode:
> > -drop_inode:				!!!inode_lock!!!
> > +drop_inode:				!!!i_lock, sb_inode_list_lock!!!
> 
> sb_inode_list_lock now is sb->s_inodes_lock, this also applies in a few
> other places.
> 
> 
> > +[mandatory]
> > +	inode_lock is gone, replaced by fine grained locks. See fs/inode.c
> > +for details of what locks to replace inode_lock with in order to protect
> > +particular things. Most of the time, a filesystem only needs ->i_lock, which
> > +protects *all* the inode state and its membership on lists that was
> > +previously protected with inode_lock.
> 
> Which list membership does i_lock protect?

Oops, I missed updating the documentation file. Will fix that up.

> > --- a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
> > +++ b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
> > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> >  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > -#include <linux/writeback.h> /* for inode_lock */
> > +#include <linux/writeback.h>
> 
> Do we still need writeback.h here?
> 
> > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
> >  #include <linux/capability.h>
> >  #include <linux/quotaops.h>
> > -#include <linux/writeback.h> /* for inode_lock, oddly enough.. */
> > +#include <linux/writeback.h>
> 
> Same here.

I'll check them and clean it up appropriately.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com