linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] fs: Reduce inode I_FREEING and factor inode disposal
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 21:52:49 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101008105249.GE4681@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101008101819.GC19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:18:19AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:21:32PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> 
> > +			spin_unlock(&sb->s_inodes_lock);
> >  
> > -			spin_lock(&inode_lru_lock);
> > -			list_move(&inode->i_lru, dispose);
> > -			spin_unlock(&inode_lru_lock);
> > +			dispose_one_inode(inode);
> >  
> > -			percpu_counter_dec(&nr_inodes_unused);
> > +			spin_lock(&sb->s_inodes_lock);
> 
> And now you've unlocked the list and even blocked.  What's going to
> keep next valid through that fun?

See the comment at the start of the loop in invalidate_list():

                /*
                 * We can reschedule here without worrying about the list's
                 * consistency because the per-sb list of inodes must not
                 * change during umount anymore, and because iprune_sem keeps
                 * shrink_icache_memory() away.
                 */
		cond_resched_lock(&sb->s_inodes_lock);

Hence I've assumed it's ok to add another point that drops locks and blocks
inside the loop and next will still be valid.

> 
> > +		spin_unlock(&inode_lru_lock);
> > +
> > +		dispose_one_inode(inode);
> > +		cond_resched();
> > +
> > +		spin_lock(&inode_lru_lock);
> 
> Same, only worse - in the previous you might hope for lack of activity
> on fs, in this one you really can't.

That one in prune_icache() is safe because the loop always gets the
first inod eon the list:

	for (nr_scanned = 0; nr_scanned < nr_to_scan; nr_scanned++) {
		struct inode *inode;

		if (list_empty(&inode_lru))
			break;

		inode = list_entry(inode_lru.prev, struct inode, i_lru);
		.....

because there is pre-existing branch in the loop that drops all the
locks.

Cheers,

Dave.



> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-08 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 162+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-08  5:21 fs: Inode cache scalability V2 Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 01/18] kernel: add bl_list Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  8:18   ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-08 10:33     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 02/18] fs: Convert nr_inodes and nr_unused to per-cpu counters Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 03/18] fs: keep inode with backing-dev Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  7:27     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 04/18] fs: Implement lazy LRU updates for inodes Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  7:31     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  9:08   ` Al Viro
2010-10-08  9:51     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 05/18] fs: inode split IO and LRU lists Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  7:38     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  9:16   ` Al Viro
2010-10-08  9:58     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 06/18] fs: Clean up inode reference counting Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  7:46     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  8:15       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 07/18] exofs: use iput() for inode reference count decrements Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16  7:56   ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 16:29     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-17 15:41       ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 08/18] fs: add inode reference coutn read accessor Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 09/18] fs: rework icount to be a locked variable Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  7:50     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  8:17       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 13:16         ` Chris Mason
2010-10-08  9:32   ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 10:15     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 13:14       ` Chris Mason
2010-10-08 13:53       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 14:09         ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 10/18] fs: Factor inode hash operations into functions Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  9:41     ` Al Viro
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 11/18] fs: Introduce per-bucket inode hash locks Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:33   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  7:51     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  9:49   ` Al Viro
2010-10-08  9:51     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 13:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 14:17     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 18:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16  7:57     ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 16:16       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16 17:12         ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-17  0:45           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-17  2:06             ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-17  0:46           ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-17  2:25             ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-18 16:16               ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-18 16:21                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-19  7:00                   ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-19 16:50                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-20  3:11                       ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-24 15:44                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-24 21:17                         ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-25  4:41                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-25  7:04                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-26  0:12                               ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-26  0:06                             ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 12/18] fs: add a per-superblock lock for the inode list Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 13/18] fs: split locking of inode writeback and LRU lists Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  8:00     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  8:18       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16  7:57         ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 16:20           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16 17:19             ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-17  1:00               ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-17  2:20                 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 14/18] fs: Protect inode->i_state with th einode->i_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  8:04     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  8:18       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16  7:57         ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 16:19           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-09  8:05       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-09 14:52       ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-10-10  2:01         ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 15/18] fs: introduce a per-cpu last_ino allocator Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  8:05     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  8:22   ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-08  8:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  9:58     ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 10:09       ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-08 10:19         ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 10:20           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-08  9:56   ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 10:03     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 10:20       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-08 13:48         ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 14:06           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-08 19:10             ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-09 17:14             ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-10-16  7:57       ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 16:22         ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16 17:21           ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 16/18] fs: Make iunique independent of inode_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  7:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  8:06     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  8:19       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 17/18] fs: icache remove inode_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  8:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08  8:09     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-13  7:20   ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-13  7:27     ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-13 11:28       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-13 12:03         ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-13 12:20           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-13 12:25             ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-13 10:42     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-13 12:07       ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-13 11:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-13 12:30       ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-13 23:23         ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-14  9:06           ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-14  9:13             ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-14 14:41             ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-15  0:14               ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15  3:13                 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-15  3:30                   ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15  3:44                     ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15  6:41                       ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 10:59                         ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-15 13:03                           ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 13:29                             ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 17:33                               ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 17:52                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-15 18:02                                   ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 18:14                                     ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16  2:09                                     ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 14:11                             ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 20:50                           ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 20:56                             ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15  4:04               ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 11:33                 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-15 13:14                   ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 15:38                   ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16  7:57   ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-08  5:21 ` [PATCH 18/18] fs: Reduce inode I_FREEING and factor inode disposal Dave Chinner
2010-10-08  8:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 10:18   ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 10:52     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-10-08 12:10       ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 13:55         ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-09 17:22   ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-10-09  8:08 ` [PATCH 19/18] fs: split __inode_add_to_list Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-12 10:47   ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-12 11:31     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-12 12:05       ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-09 11:18 ` [PATCH 20/18] fs: do not assign default i_ino in new_inode Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101008105249.GE4681@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).