From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] fs: Reduce inode I_FREEING and factor inode disposal
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 21:52:49 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101008105249.GE4681@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101008101819.GC19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:18:19AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:21:32PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> > + spin_unlock(&sb->s_inodes_lock);
> >
> > - spin_lock(&inode_lru_lock);
> > - list_move(&inode->i_lru, dispose);
> > - spin_unlock(&inode_lru_lock);
> > + dispose_one_inode(inode);
> >
> > - percpu_counter_dec(&nr_inodes_unused);
> > + spin_lock(&sb->s_inodes_lock);
>
> And now you've unlocked the list and even blocked. What's going to
> keep next valid through that fun?
See the comment at the start of the loop in invalidate_list():
/*
* We can reschedule here without worrying about the list's
* consistency because the per-sb list of inodes must not
* change during umount anymore, and because iprune_sem keeps
* shrink_icache_memory() away.
*/
cond_resched_lock(&sb->s_inodes_lock);
Hence I've assumed it's ok to add another point that drops locks and blocks
inside the loop and next will still be valid.
>
> > + spin_unlock(&inode_lru_lock);
> > +
> > + dispose_one_inode(inode);
> > + cond_resched();
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&inode_lru_lock);
>
> Same, only worse - in the previous you might hope for lack of activity
> on fs, in this one you really can't.
That one in prune_icache() is safe because the loop always gets the
first inod eon the list:
for (nr_scanned = 0; nr_scanned < nr_to_scan; nr_scanned++) {
struct inode *inode;
if (list_empty(&inode_lru))
break;
inode = list_entry(inode_lru.prev, struct inode, i_lru);
.....
because there is pre-existing branch in the loop that drops all the
locks.
Cheers,
Dave.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-08 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 162+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-08 5:21 fs: Inode cache scalability V2 Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 01/18] kernel: add bl_list Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 8:18 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-08 10:33 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 02/18] fs: Convert nr_inodes and nr_unused to per-cpu counters Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 03/18] fs: keep inode with backing-dev Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 7:27 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 04/18] fs: Implement lazy LRU updates for inodes Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 7:31 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 9:08 ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 9:51 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 05/18] fs: inode split IO and LRU lists Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 7:38 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 9:16 ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 9:58 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 06/18] fs: Clean up inode reference counting Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 7:46 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 07/18] exofs: use iput() for inode reference count decrements Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16 7:56 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 16:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-17 15:41 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 08/18] fs: add inode reference coutn read accessor Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 09/18] fs: rework icount to be a locked variable Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 7:50 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 13:16 ` Chris Mason
2010-10-08 9:32 ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 10:15 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 13:14 ` Chris Mason
2010-10-08 13:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 14:09 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 10/18] fs: Factor inode hash operations into functions Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 9:41 ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 11/18] fs: Introduce per-bucket inode hash locks Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 7:51 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 9:49 ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 9:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 13:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 14:17 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 18:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16 7:57 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 16:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16 17:12 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-17 0:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-17 2:06 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-17 0:46 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-17 2:25 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-18 16:16 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-18 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-19 7:00 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-19 16:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-20 3:11 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-24 15:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-24 21:17 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-25 4:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-25 7:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-26 0:12 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-26 0:06 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 12/18] fs: add a per-superblock lock for the inode list Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 13/18] fs: split locking of inode writeback and LRU lists Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 8:00 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16 7:57 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 16:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16 17:19 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-17 1:00 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-17 2:20 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 14/18] fs: Protect inode->i_state with th einode->i_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 8:04 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16 7:57 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-09 8:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-09 14:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-10-10 2:01 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 15/18] fs: introduce a per-cpu last_ino allocator Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 8:05 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 8:22 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-08 8:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 9:58 ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 10:09 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-08 10:19 ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 10:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-08 9:56 ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 10:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 10:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-08 13:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 14:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-08 19:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-09 17:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-10-16 7:57 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 16:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16 17:21 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 16/18] fs: Make iunique independent of inode_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 7:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 8:06 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 8:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 17/18] fs: icache remove inode_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 8:09 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-13 7:20 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-13 7:27 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-13 11:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-13 12:03 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-13 12:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-13 12:25 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-13 10:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-13 12:07 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-13 11:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-13 12:30 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-13 23:23 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-14 9:06 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-14 9:13 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-14 14:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-15 0:14 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 3:13 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-15 3:30 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 3:44 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 6:41 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 10:59 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-15 13:03 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 13:29 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 17:33 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 17:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-15 18:02 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 18:14 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 2:09 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 14:11 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 20:50 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 20:56 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 4:04 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 11:33 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-15 13:14 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-15 15:38 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 7:57 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-08 5:21 ` [PATCH 18/18] fs: Reduce inode I_FREEING and factor inode disposal Dave Chinner
2010-10-08 8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 10:18 ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 10:52 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-10-08 12:10 ` Al Viro
2010-10-08 13:55 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-09 17:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-10-09 8:08 ` [PATCH 19/18] fs: split __inode_add_to_list Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-12 10:47 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-12 11:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-12 12:05 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-09 11:18 ` [PATCH 20/18] fs: do not assign default i_ino in new_inode Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101008105249.GE4681@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).