* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 19932] New: Getting lots of name_count maxed, losing inode data messages in /var/log/messages
[not found] <bug-19932-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
@ 2010-10-11 21:34 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-11 21:42 ` Eric Paris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2010-10-11 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Al Viro, Eric Paris; +Cc: bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon, linux-fsdevel
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 06:58:14 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19932
>
> Summary: Getting lots of name_count maxed, losing inode data
> messages in /var/log/messages
> Product: Other
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.35.7
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: Other
> AssignedTo: other_other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
> ReportedBy: jd1008@gmail.com
> Regression: No
>
>
> This old problem was also reported in redhat in redhat bugzilla:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445757
> in mid 2008.
>
>
> The message is coming from kernel/auditsc.c in audit_inc_name_count():
>
>
> static int audit_inc_name_count(struct audit_context *context,
> const struct inode *inode)
> {
> if (context->name_count >= AUDIT_NAMES) {
> if (inode)
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "audit: name_count maxed, losing
> inode data: "
> "dev=%02x:%02x, inode=%lu\n",
> MAJOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev),
> MINOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev),
> inode->i_ino);
>
> else
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "name_count maxed, losing inode
> data\n");
> return 1;
> }
> context->name_count++;
> #if AUDIT_DEBUG
> context->ino_count++;
> #endif
> return 0;
> }
>
> I wish the kernel would also dump the stack, and funcs param values into
> /var/log/messages
> so a user can take a look at the source and do some searching
> for the cause of this.
>
> Also, if you can advise on how I can rebuild the kernel so that
> it will drop into the debugger when this happens, would be a great
> help.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 19932] New: Getting lots of name_count maxed, losing inode data messages in /var/log/messages
2010-10-11 21:34 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 19932] New: Getting lots of name_count maxed, losing inode data messages in /var/log/messages Andrew Morton
@ 2010-10-11 21:42 ` Eric Paris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Paris @ 2010-10-11 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Al Viro, bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon, linux-fsdevel
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 14:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
> bugzilla web interface).
>
> On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 06:58:14 GMT
> bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
>
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19932
> >
> > Summary: Getting lots of name_count maxed, losing inode data
> > messages in /var/log/messages
> > Product: Other
> > Version: 2.5
> > Kernel Version: 2.6.35.7
> > Platform: All
> > OS/Version: Linux
> > Tree: Mainline
> > Status: NEW
> > Severity: normal
> > Priority: P1
> > Component: Other
> > AssignedTo: other_other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
> > ReportedBy: jd1008@gmail.com
> > Regression: No
> >
> >
> > This old problem was also reported in redhat in redhat bugzilla:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445757
> > in mid 2008.
> >
> >
> > The message is coming from kernel/auditsc.c in audit_inc_name_count():
> >
> >
> > static int audit_inc_name_count(struct audit_context *context,
> > const struct inode *inode)
> > {
> > if (context->name_count >= AUDIT_NAMES) {
> > if (inode)
> > printk(KERN_DEBUG "audit: name_count maxed, losing
> > inode data: "
> > "dev=%02x:%02x, inode=%lu\n",
> > MAJOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev),
> > MINOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev),
> > inode->i_ino);
> >
> > else
> > printk(KERN_DEBUG "name_count maxed, losing inode
> > data\n");
> > return 1;
> > }
> > context->name_count++;
> > #if AUDIT_DEBUG
> > context->ino_count++;
> > #endif
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > I wish the kernel would also dump the stack, and funcs param values into
> > /var/log/messages
> > so a user can take a look at the source and do some searching
> > for the cause of this.
> >
> > Also, if you can advise on how I can rebuild the kernel so that
> > it will drop into the debugger when this happens, would be a great
> > help.
The audit systems has a hard coded value of 20 for the number of
inodes/pathnames it will collect information about in a single syscall.
Loading modules (such as kvm) are known to create all sorts of entries
in debugfs which overflows audit's tracking. I also know that mounting
nfs the first time can do it setting up rpcfs.
I fixed it in RHEL by just changing the static 20 to a dynamic list but
I don't think Al liked that solution for upstream and instead wanted to
find all of the places we were overrunning 20 (hell overrunning 5 is a
problem) and figure out how to stop them from overrunning (typically by
disabling audit was his thought)
I just haven't gotten back to it as they are harmless (if scary
sounding)
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-11 21:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-19932-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2010-10-11 21:34 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 19932] New: Getting lots of name_count maxed, losing inode data messages in /var/log/messages Andrew Morton
2010-10-11 21:42 ` Eric Paris
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).