From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] dcache cleanups
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:04:59 +1100
Message-ID: <20101013010459.GS4681@dastard>
References: <20101010093620.416498597@canuck.infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, eparis@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bld-mail16.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.101]:33122 "EHLO
	mail.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752105Ab0JMBFD (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:05:03 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101010093620.416498597@canuck.infradead.org>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 05:36:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> A couple of dcache cleanups in preparation of the dcache_lock splitup.
> Note that I already sent the first patch individually, but this series
> contains a fixed version.

This applies on top of my inode-scale branch, right?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com