From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] dcache cleanups Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:21:20 -0400 Message-ID: <20101013112120.GA15683@infradead.org> References: <20101010093620.416498597@canuck.infradead.org> <20101013010459.GS4681@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, eparis@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:36665 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753609Ab0JMLV1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:21:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101013010459.GS4681@dastard> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:04:59PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 05:36:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > A couple of dcache cleanups in preparation of the dcache_lock splitup. > > Note that I already sent the first patch individually, but this series > > contains a fixed version. > > This applies on top of my inode-scale branch, right? Yes.