From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/18] fs: Introduce per-bucket inode hash locks Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:05:47 -0400 Message-ID: <20101013150547.GA12757@infradead.org> References: <1286928961-15157-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1286928961-15157-10-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:48302 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751896Ab0JMPFs (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:05:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1286928961-15157-10-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > + > +/** > + * hlist_bl_lock - lock a hash list > + * @h: hash list head to lock > + */ > +static inline void hlist_bl_lock(struct hlist_bl_head *h) > +{ > + bit_spin_lock(0, (unsigned long *)h); > +} > + > +/** > + * hlist_bl_unlock - unlock a hash list > + * @h: hash list head to unlock > + */ > +static inline void hlist_bl_unlock(struct hlist_bl_head *h) > +{ > + __bit_spin_unlock(0, (unsigned long *)h); > +} I think the locking helpers should come with the rest of the bl_list implementation in patch1.