From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] fs: icache remove inode_lock Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:09:18 +1100 Message-ID: <20101016020918.GA5294@amd> References: <20101015031343.GG4681@dastard> <20101015033017.GA6750@amd> <20101015034451.GA6827@amd> <20101015064150.GB7511@amd> <20101015105943.GE32255@dastard> <20101015130259.GA3207@amd> <20101015132938.GA3936@amd> <20101015173345.GA10731@amd> <20101015175247.GA6737@infradead.org> <20101015180219.GA11110@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Nick Piggin Return-path: Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.145]:18664 "EHLO ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752016Ab0JPCJW (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:09:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101015180219.GA11110@amd> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 05:02:19AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 01:52:47PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Thanks for trying to get back to a technical discussion. Maybe we > > can just move the technical comments to direct replies to the patches > > and leave this not very helpful subthread behind? > > I had plenty of other technical comments which you ignored about > per-zone shrinkers and stragegy to merge the overall series. If you > are going to keep claiming these are show stoppers, please address > my comments there too. Ping?