From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [v2] Remaining BKL users, what to do Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:19:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20101018161924.GA9571@infradead.org> References: <201009161632.59210.arnd@arndb.de> <201010181742.06678.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, ksummit-2010-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, autofs@linux.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Christoph Hellwig , Mikulas Patocka , Trond Myklebust , Petr Vandrovec , Anders Larsen , Jan Kara , Evgeniy Dushistov , Ingo Molnar , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Hendry , David Miller , Jan Harkes , Bryan Schumaker To: Arnd Bergmann Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201010181742.06678.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Before we get into all these fringe drivers: - I've not seen any progrss on ->get_sb BKL removal for a while - locks.c is probably a higher priorit, too.