From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] IMA: move read/write counters into struct inode Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:29:07 -0400 Message-ID: <20101019162907.GA5785@infradead.org> References: <20101019011650.25346.99614.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> <20101019013037.GA31393@infradead.org> <1287454443.2530.124.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20101019073901.GB11284@dastard> <1287505483.2530.174.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, zohar@us.ibm.com, warthog9@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, kyle@mcmartin.ca, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk To: Eric Paris Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:54979 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755415Ab0JSQ3U (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:29:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1287505483.2530.174.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Eric, I think you and just about everyone here are on a different page, and before we have the basic disagreement settled I'm not sure we can make much progress. Can you please explain why a feature like IMA that no sane user would ever want should cause _any_ overhead for users that just have it compiled in because their distro or defconfig did without actually using. What exactly is the problem to require the few people that want it to use a kernel command line option and/or an _DEFAULT_ON config option?