From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
zohar@us.ibm.com, warthog9@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
jmorris@namei.org, kyle@mcmartin.ca, hpa@zytor.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] IMA: move read/write counters into struct inode
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:11:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101019191133.GE2447@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101019172805.GU19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 06:28:05PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> I'd rather not say what I think about IMA sanity (and usefulness); as for what
> it tries to do... They want to whine if you open a file that is already opened
> for write and they want to whine if you open a file for write when it's already
> opened for read. Unless they decide to leave the file alone, that is.
Hm. Sounds like the same question that the file leases code needs
answered. The important difference is that the leases code can just
refuse to set a lease on inodes with multiple dentries.
While my mind's on it ... Al, is this code even close to correct?
if ((arg == F_RDLCK) && (atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) > 0))
goto out;
if ((arg == F_WRLCK)
&& ((atomic_read(&dentry->d_count) > 1)
|| (atomic_read(&inode->i_count) > 1)))
goto out;
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-19 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-19 1:16 [PATCH 1/3] IMA: move read/write counters into struct inode Eric Paris
2010-10-19 1:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] IMA: only allocate iint when needed Eric Paris
2010-10-19 1:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] IMA: use rbtree instead of radix tree for inode information cache Eric Paris
2010-10-19 1:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] IMA: move read/write counters into struct inode Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-19 2:14 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-19 7:39 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-19 16:24 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-19 16:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-19 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-19 2:46 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-19 15:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-19 16:36 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-19 16:55 ` Al Viro
2010-10-19 17:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-19 17:28 ` Al Viro
2010-10-19 18:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2010-10-20 13:10 ` John Stoffel
2010-10-20 13:36 ` Al Viro
2010-10-20 14:09 ` John Stoffel
2010-10-19 19:11 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2010-10-20 3:15 ` Al Viro
2010-10-20 17:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-19 22:49 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-20 14:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-20 14:46 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-20 15:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-20 15:25 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-21 16:15 ` Casey Schaufler
2010-10-22 8:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-22 17:50 ` Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101019191133.GE2447@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=warthog9@kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).