linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: sfrench@us.ibm.com, ffilz@us.ibm.com, agruen@suse.de,
	adilger@sun.com, sandeen@redhat.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	jlayton@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V4 00/11]  New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:09:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101025190901.GA13523@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101012153507.GC12752@fieldses.org>

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:35:07AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:47:38PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote:
> > What we need in the first step is to get VFS changes reviewed.Once we
> > agree on the VFS changes done, then we can start looking at the changes
> > upto NFS richacl nfs support. When get that merged then we can start
> > having discussion on how local file system maintainers want to migrate
> > the existing file system with posixacl to richacl.
> 
> OK.  So, personally: I'm resigned to the idea that we want support for
> this ACL model.  The vfs changes look OK to me (and wouldn't be changed
> by any comments I'd have on the more richacl-specific patches to
> follow).  So that's an ACK from me on the first set of these patches,
> assuming it's OK with people to merge these things one step at a time.

Is there any progress on this?

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-25 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-24 12:48 [PATCH -V4 00/11] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 01/11] vfs: Indicate that the permission functions take all the MAY_* flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 02/11] vfs: Pass all mask flags down to iop->check_acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 03/11] vfs: Add a comment to inode_permission() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 04/11] vfs: Add generic IS_ACL() test for acl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 05/11] vfs: Add IS_RICHACL() test for richacl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 06/11] vfs: Optimize out IS_RICHACL() if CONFIG_FS_RICHACL is not defined Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 07/11] vfs: Make acl_permission_check() work for richacls Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 15:50   ` Jeff Layton
2010-09-24 18:55     ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-09-27 13:03       ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 08/11] vfs: Add new file and directory create permission flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 15:54   ` Jeff Layton
2010-09-24 19:16     ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-09-24 19:23       ` Jeff Layton
2010-09-27 13:14     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-01-02 23:21       ` Ted Ts'o
2011-01-03  5:20         ` Andreas Dilger
2011-01-03  5:59           ` Andreas Dilger
2011-01-03 14:20         ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 09/11] vfs: Add delete child and delete self " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 10/11] vfs: Make the inode passed to inode_change_ok non-const Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 11/11] vfs: Add permission flags for setting file attributes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-10-12  0:24 ` [PATCH -V4 00/11] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-12  7:17   ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-10-12 15:35     ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-25 19:09       ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2010-10-26  4:35         ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-11-01 15:30           ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101025190901.GA13523@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=agruen@suse.de \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ffilz@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=jra@samba.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=sfrench@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).