From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH -V4 00/11] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:09:02 -0400 Message-ID: <20101025190901.GA13523@fieldses.org> References: <1285332494-12756-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20101012002409.GH16442@fieldses.org> <20101012153507.GC12752@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: sfrench@us.ibm.com, ffilz@us.ibm.com, agruen@suse.de, adilger@sun.com, sandeen@redhat.com, tytso@mit.edu, jlayton@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Allison To: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" Return-path: Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:49104 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932889Ab0JYTJQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:09:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101012153507.GC12752@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:35:07AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:47:38PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote: > > What we need in the first step is to get VFS changes reviewed.Once we > > agree on the VFS changes done, then we can start looking at the changes > > upto NFS richacl nfs support. When get that merged then we can start > > having discussion on how local file system maintainers want to migrate > > the existing file system with posixacl to richacl. > > OK. So, personally: I'm resigned to the idea that we want support for > this ACL model. The vfs changes look OK to me (and wouldn't be changed > by any comments I'd have on the more richacl-specific patches to > follow). So that's an ACK from me on the first set of these patches, > assuming it's OK with people to merge these things one step at a time. Is there any progress on this? --b.