From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: do not drop inode_lock in dispose_list Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:07:23 +1100 Message-ID: <20101025230723.GV32255@dastard> References: <20101024174024.GA2718@lst.de> <20101025053353.GA16131@dastard> <20101025054611.GB16131@dastard> <20101025100758.GA32680@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from bld-mail18.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.103]:48039 "EHLO mail.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753065Ab0JYXH1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:07:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101025100758.GA32680@lst.de> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:07:58PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:46:11PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Not sure whether it's my merge, something in Al's tree series or > > something brought in from the post-2.6.36 tree, but it goes splat > > pretty quickly (xfstest 013) with: > > That's because the version of the separate wb and lru lists patch that > Al took from your tree was missing various deletions from the wb list. > > Below is the fix I sent him, not sure why it didn't make it to the list: Fix works just fine. Thanks. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com