From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Charles Manning Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/29] Staging: Add yaffs2 filesystem Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 08:14:35 +1300 Message-ID: <201011020814.35902.manningc2@actrix.gen.nz> References: <1288636877-7964-1-git-send-email-tdent48227@gmail.com> <4CCF0D2B.6070308@caviumnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tracey Dent , greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: David Daney Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4CCF0D2B.6070308@caviumnetworks.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 02 November 2010 07:55:39 David Daney wrote: > On 11/01/2010 11:40 AM, Tracey Dent wrote: > > The patch sets puts the yaffs2 filesystem in the staging directory. > > It is all based on Charles git > > tree(http://github.com/cdhmanning/linux-yaffs-integration/). Everything > > is compile tested and it builds. > > > > This only the inital support and I will be sending more cleanup patches. > > > > Greg can you add the patch set into your staging-next tree. > > Also, It doesn't affect anything other than itself. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tracey Dent > > I am confused. > > Are you and Charles Manning working together on this? > > Did you write all this code or did Charles? If it was Charles, why are > there no From: and Signed-off-by headers for him? > > Thanks in advance for enlightening us as to what is going on here, > David Daney We are not working together on this, but I do appreciate the effort in helping bring to a head what people like/dislike. I am trying to keep the kernel yaffs consistent with the yaffs.net yaffs so that it is easier to add changes from yaffs.net. -- Charles