From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH, RFC] prune back iprune_sem
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 19:45:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101102184536.GA22941@lst.de> (raw)
iprune_sem is continously giving us lockdep warnings because we do take it in
read mode in the reclaim path, but we're also doing non-NOFS allocations under
it taken in write mode.
Taking a bit deeper look at it I think it's fixable quite trivially:
- for invalidate_inodes we do not need iprune_sem at all. We have an active
reference on the superblock, so the filesystem is not going away until it
has finished.
- for evict_inodes we do need it, to make sure prune_icache has done it's
work before we tear down the superblock. But there is no reason to
hold it over the actual reclaim operation - it's enough to cycle through
it after the actual reclaim to make sure we wait for any pending
prune_icache to complete.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index ae2727a..cfa7722 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -492,8 +492,6 @@ void evict_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
struct inode *inode, *next;
LIST_HEAD(dispose);
- down_write(&iprune_sem);
-
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, next, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count))
@@ -518,6 +516,13 @@ void evict_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
dispose_list(&dispose);
+
+ /*
+ * Cycle through iprune_sem to make sure any inode that prune_icache
+ * moved off the list before we took the lock has been fully torn
+ * down.
+ */
+ down_write(&iprune_sem);
up_write(&iprune_sem);
}
@@ -534,8 +539,6 @@ int invalidate_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
struct inode *inode, *next;
LIST_HEAD(dispose);
- down_write(&iprune_sem);
-
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, next, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
if (inode->i_state & (I_NEW | I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE))
@@ -559,7 +562,6 @@ int invalidate_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
dispose_list(&dispose);
- up_write(&iprune_sem);
return busy;
}
next reply other threads:[~2010-11-02 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-02 18:45 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-11-04 23:32 ` [PATCH, RFC] prune back iprune_sem Jan Kara
2011-02-15 10:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-02-15 14:49 ` Jan Kara
2011-02-15 14:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101102184536.GA22941@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).