From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] FS: cifs, remove unneeded NULL tests Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:00:12 +0000 Message-ID: <20101103100012.GA19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1288624135-24170-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: sfrench-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, jirislaby-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jeff Layton , Christoph Hellwig To: Jiri Slaby Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1288624135-24170-1-git-send-email-jslaby-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 04:08:55PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > Stanse found that pSMBFile in cifs_ioctl and file->f_path.dentry in > cifs_user_write are dereferenced prior their test to NULL. file->f_path.dentry is never NULL for an opened file, neither is file->f_path.dentry->d_inode (which cannot change for the entire lifetime of dentry, BTW). IOW, > - /* since the write may have blocked check these pointers again */ > - if ((file->f_path.dentry) && (file->f_path.dentry->d_inode)) { > - struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode; in there had always been junk. So yes, losing these tests is the right thing to do.