From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: [PATCH] ioprio: rcu_read_lock/unlock protect find_task_by_vpid call (V2)
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:21:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101109102124.GA3916@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> (raw)
Commit 4221a9918e38b7494cee341dda7b7b4bb8c04bde "Add RCU check for
find_task_by_vpid()" introduced rcu_lockdep_assert to find_task_by_pid_ns.
Assertion failed in sys_ioprio_get. The patch is fixing assertion
failure in ioprio_set as well.
kernel/pid.c:419 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
stack backtrace:
Pid: 4254, comm: iotop Not tainted
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff810656f2>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xaa/0xb2
[<ffffffff81053c67>] find_task_by_pid_ns+0x4f/0x68
[<ffffffff81053c9d>] find_task_by_vpid+0x1d/0x1f
[<ffffffff811104e2>] sys_ioprio_get+0x50/0x2da
[<ffffffff81002182>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
V2: rcu critical section expanded according to comment by Paul E. McKenne:
| Looking over the patch again, the scope of the RCU read-side critical
| section needs to expand to cover the use of the pointer as well as the
| call to find_task_by_vpid().
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/fs/ioprio.c b/fs/ioprio.c
index 748cfb9..64cd50b 100644
--- a/fs/ioprio.c
+++ b/fs/ioprio.c
@@ -111,12 +111,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(ioprio_set, int, which, int, who, int, ioprio)
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
switch (which) {
case IOPRIO_WHO_PROCESS:
+ rcu_read_lock();
if (!who)
p = current;
else
p = find_task_by_vpid(who);
if (p)
ret = set_task_ioprio(p, ioprio);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
break;
case IOPRIO_WHO_PGRP:
if (!who)
@@ -200,12 +202,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(ioprio_get, int, which, int, who)
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
switch (which) {
case IOPRIO_WHO_PROCESS:
+ rcu_read_lock();
if (!who)
p = current;
else
p = find_task_by_vpid(who);
if (p)
ret = get_task_ioprio(p);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
break;
case IOPRIO_WHO_PGRP:
if (!who)
next reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-09 10:21 Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2010-11-09 20:15 ` [PATCH] ioprio: rcu_read_lock/unlock protect find_task_by_vpid call (V2) Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-09 20:20 ` Jens Axboe
2010-11-09 20:48 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101109102124.GA3916@swordfish.minsk.epam.com \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).