From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 3/6] fs: dcache documentation cleanup
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:58:54 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101109125854.GD11477@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101109124610.GB11477@amd>
I would like to get the following 3 patches merged soon, because they
touch a lot of filesystems but quite trivially. (this clashes trivially
with rcu patches if taken out of order, but easily fixable).
Where are we going?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/npiggin/linux-npiggin.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.txt;h=5435c136d0307854761e9aaaa9886e282d67a881;hb=refs/heads/vfs-scale
So please review that if you still have doubts about the overall design.
I have been toying with pulling rcu-walk first, before dcache scaling.
I'm not really happy with it, because the property that d_lock protects
d_count and d_seq and all other elements of the dentry really help make
it easy to see that concurrency isn't a problem when doing tricky things
like converting rcu-and-seqlock based walking into lock-and-refcount
based walking mid-way through a path lookup.
So while it is _possible_ to use dcache_lock and careful use of
atomic_inc_not_zero etc. for these things, that really sucks and is
going in totally the wrong direction (rcu-walk dropping is not a
completely rare event, so we could end up with more dcache_lock locking
in path walk than we have now).
--
Remove redundant (actually incorrect, since dcache RCU lookup) dentry
locking documentation and point to the canonical document.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
---
include/linux/dcache.h | 18 ++++++------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/dcache.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/dcache.h 2010-11-09 22:11:00.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/dcache.h 2010-11-09 23:22:52.000000000 +1100
@@ -141,22 +141,16 @@ struct dentry_operations {
char *(*d_dname)(struct dentry *, char *, int);
};
-/* the dentry parameter passed to d_hash and d_compare is the parent
+/*
+ * Locking rules for dentry_operations callbacks are to be found in
+ * Documentation/filesystems/Locking. Keep it updated!
+ *
+ * the dentry parameter passed to d_hash and d_compare is the parent
* directory of the entries to be compared. It is used in case these
* functions need any directory specific information for determining
* equivalency classes. Using the dentry itself might not work, as it
* might be a negative dentry which has no information associated with
- * it */
-
-/*
-locking rules:
- big lock dcache_lock d_lock may block
-d_revalidate: no no no yes
-d_hash no no no yes
-d_compare: no yes yes no
-d_delete: no yes no no
-d_release: no no no yes
-d_iput: no no no yes
+ * it.
*/
/* d_flags entries */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-09 12:46 [patch 1/6] fs: icache RCU free inodes Nick Piggin
2010-11-09 12:47 ` [patch 2/6] fs: icache avoid RCU freeing for pseudo fs Nick Piggin
2010-11-09 12:58 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-11-09 16:24 ` [patch 3/6] fs: dcache documentation cleanup Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-09 22:06 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-10 16:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-09 13:01 ` [patch 4/6] fs: d_delete change Nick Piggin
2010-11-09 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-09 22:08 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-10 16:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-11 0:27 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-11 22:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-09 13:02 ` [patch 5/6] fs: d_compare change for rcu-walk Nick Piggin
2010-11-09 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-10 1:48 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-09 13:03 ` [patch 6/6] fs: d_hash " Nick Piggin
2010-11-09 14:19 ` [patch 1/6] fs: icache RCU free inodes Andi Kleen
2010-11-09 21:36 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-10 14:47 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-11 4:27 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-09 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-09 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-09 21:48 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-09 16:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-09 17:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-09 17:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-09 21:55 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-09 22:05 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-12 1:24 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-12 4:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-12 6:02 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-12 6:49 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-12 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-12 23:17 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-15 1:00 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-15 4:21 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 3:02 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-16 3:49 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-17 1:12 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-17 4:18 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-17 5:56 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-17 6:04 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-09 21:44 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101109125854.GD11477@amd \
--to=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).