From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] fs: d_delete change
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:25:16 -0500
Message-ID: <20101109162516.GB6217@infradead.org>
References: <20101109124610.GB11477@amd>
 <20101109130133.GE11477@amd>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:48444 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752443Ab0KIQZS (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:25:18 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101109130133.GE11477@amd>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

The patch looks fine to me, and I'm also fine with merging it ASAP.
But the patch subject and commit message are not very descriptive.