From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [patch 5/6] fs: d_compare change for rcu-walk Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:48:18 +1100 Message-ID: <20101110014818.GA4187@amd> References: <20101109124610.GB11477@amd> <20101109130235.GF11477@amd> <20101109162555.GC6217@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Nick Piggin , Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.145]:36046 "EHLO ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752129Ab0KJBsh (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 20:48:37 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101109162555.GC6217@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:25:55AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:02:35AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > cifs and jfs contain the non-trivial changes, where they no longer > > overwrite dentry name in their d_compare(), but rather use the > > d_revalidate() method for ensuring case preservation in the presence > > of negative dentries, taken from fatfs. > > Please split these out to separate patches, and make sure you get Yeah, good suggestion. > a review and testing from the jfs and cifs maintainers. I don't think > this is .37 material any more. We'll see. It's pretty trivial to test really, and method reused from fatfs.