From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] fix up lock order reversal in writeback
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:01:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101116130146.GG4757@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101116110058.GA4298@amd>
On Tue 16-11-10 22:00:58, Nick Piggin wrote:
> I saw a lock order warning on ext4 trigger. This should solve it.
> Raciness shouldn't matter much, because writeback can stop just
> after we make the test and return anyway (so the API is racy anyway).
Hmm, for now the fix is OK. Ultimately, we probably want to call
writeback_inodes_sb() directly from all the callers. They all just want to
reduce uncertainty of delayed allocation reservations by writing delayed
data and actually wait for some of the writeback to happen before they
retry again the allocation.
Although the callers generally cannot get umount_sem because they hold
other locks, they have the superblock well pinned so grabbing umount_sem
makes sense mostly to make assertions happy. But as I'm thinking about it,
trylock *is* maybe the right answer to this anyway...
So
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/fs-writeback.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2010-11-16 21:44:32.000000000 +1100
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/fs-writeback.c 2010-11-16 21:49:37.000000000 +1100
> @@ -1125,16 +1125,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb);
> *
> * Invoke writeback_inodes_sb if no writeback is currently underway.
> * Returns 1 if writeback was started, 0 if not.
> + *
> + * May be called inside i_lock. May not start writeback if locks cannot
> + * be acquired.
> */
> int writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> if (!writeback_in_progress(sb->s_bdi)) {
> - down_read(&sb->s_umount);
> - writeback_inodes_sb(sb);
> - up_read(&sb->s_umount);
> - return 1;
> - } else
> - return 0;
> + if (down_read_trylock(&sb->s_umount)) {
> + writeback_inodes_sb(sb);
> + up_read(&sb->s_umount);
> + return 1;
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle);
>
> @@ -1145,17 +1149,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb_if_idl
> *
> * Invoke writeback_inodes_sb if no writeback is currently underway.
> * Returns 1 if writeback was started, 0 if not.
> + *
> + * May be called inside i_lock. May not start writeback if locks cannot
> + * be acquired.
> */
> int writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle(struct super_block *sb,
> unsigned long nr)
> {
> if (!writeback_in_progress(sb->s_bdi)) {
> - down_read(&sb->s_umount);
> - writeback_inodes_sb_nr(sb, nr);
> - up_read(&sb->s_umount);
> - return 1;
> - } else
> - return 0;
> + if (down_read_trylock(&sb->s_umount)) {
> + writeback_inodes_sb_nr(sb, nr);
> + up_read(&sb->s_umount);
> + return 1;
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-16 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-16 11:00 [patch] fix up lock order reversal in writeback Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 13:01 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2010-11-17 4:30 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-17 4:38 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-17 5:05 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-17 6:10 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-18 3:06 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-18 3:29 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 6:00 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-18 6:28 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 8:18 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-18 10:51 ` Theodore Tso
2010-11-18 17:58 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-19 5:10 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-19 12:07 ` Theodore Tso
2010-11-18 14:55 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-18 17:10 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 18:04 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-18 18:24 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-18 18:39 ` Chris Mason
2010-11-18 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 18:51 ` Chris Mason
2010-11-18 20:22 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 20:36 ` Chris Mason
2010-11-18 19:02 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-18 20:17 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 18:33 ` Chris Mason
2010-11-18 23:58 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-19 0:45 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-19 5:16 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-22 18:16 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-23 8:07 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-23 13:32 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-23 8:15 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-18 18:53 ` Al Viro
2010-11-18 3:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-22 23:43 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-16 20:32 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-17 3:56 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101116130146.GG4757@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).