From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 11/28] fs: dcache scale lru
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:09:11 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101116142029.238128970@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20101116140900.039761100@kernel.dk
[-- Attachment #1: fs-dcache-scale-d_lru.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 8782 bytes --]
Add a new lock, dcache_lru_lock, to protect the dcache LRU list from concurrent
modification. d_lru is also protected by d_lock.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
---
fs/dcache.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/dcache.c 2010-11-17 00:52:37.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c 2010-11-17 01:05:46.000000000 +1100
@@ -37,11 +37,19 @@
/*
* Usage:
- * dcache_hash_lock protects dcache hash table
+ * dcache_hash_lock protects:
+ * - the dcache hash table
+ * dcache_lru_lock protects:
+ * - the dcache lru lists and counters
+ * d_lock protects:
+ * - d_flags
+ * - d_name
+ * - d_lru
*
* Ordering:
* dcache_lock
* dentry->d_lock
+ * dcache_lru_lock
* dcache_hash_lock
*
* if (dentry1 < dentry2)
@@ -52,6 +60,7 @@ int sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure __read_mos
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure);
__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dcache_hash_lock);
+static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dcache_lru_lock);
__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dcache_lock);
__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SEQLOCK(rename_lock);
@@ -148,28 +157,38 @@ static void dentry_iput(struct dentry *
}
/*
- * dentry_lru_(add|del|move_tail) must be called with dcache_lock held.
+ * dentry_lru_(add|del|move_tail) must be called with d_lock held.
*/
static void dentry_lru_add(struct dentry *dentry)
{
if (list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
list_add(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru);
dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused++;
percpu_counter_inc(&nr_dentry_unused);
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
}
}
+static void __dentry_lru_del(struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+ list_del_init(&dentry->d_lru);
+ dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused--;
+ percpu_counter_dec(&nr_dentry_unused);
+}
+
static void dentry_lru_del(struct dentry *dentry)
{
if (!list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
- list_del_init(&dentry->d_lru);
- dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused--;
- percpu_counter_dec(&nr_dentry_unused);
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
+ __dentry_lru_del(dentry);
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
}
}
static void dentry_lru_move_tail(struct dentry *dentry)
{
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
if (list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
list_add_tail(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru);
dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused++;
@@ -177,6 +196,7 @@ static void dentry_lru_move_tail(struct
} else {
list_move_tail(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru);
}
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
}
/**
@@ -186,6 +206,8 @@ static void dentry_lru_move_tail(struct
* The dentry must already be unhashed and removed from the LRU.
*
* If this is the root of the dentry tree, return NULL.
+ *
+ * dcache_lock and d_lock must be held by caller, are dropped by d_kill.
*/
static struct dentry *d_kill(struct dentry *dentry)
__releases(dentry->d_lock)
@@ -341,10 +363,19 @@ int d_invalidate(struct dentry * dentry)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_invalidate);
/* This should be called _only_ with dcache_lock held */
+static inline struct dentry * __dget_locked_dlock(struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+ atomic_inc(&dentry->d_count);
+ dentry_lru_del(dentry);
+ return dentry;
+}
+
static inline struct dentry * __dget_locked(struct dentry *dentry)
{
atomic_inc(&dentry->d_count);
+ spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
dentry_lru_del(dentry);
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
return dentry;
}
@@ -423,7 +454,7 @@ void d_prune_aliases(struct inode *inode
list_for_each_entry(dentry, &inode->i_dentry, d_alias) {
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
if (!atomic_read(&dentry->d_count)) {
- __dget_locked(dentry);
+ __dget_locked_dlock(dentry);
__d_drop(dentry);
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
@@ -447,7 +478,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_prune_aliases);
static void prune_one_dentry(struct dentry * dentry)
__releases(dentry->d_lock)
__releases(dcache_lock)
- __acquires(dcache_lock)
{
__d_drop(dentry);
dentry = d_kill(dentry);
@@ -456,15 +486,16 @@ static void prune_one_dentry(struct dent
* Prune ancestors. Locking is simpler than in dput(),
* because dcache_lock needs to be taken anyway.
*/
- spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
while (dentry) {
- if (!atomic_dec_and_lock(&dentry->d_count, &dentry->d_lock))
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ if (!atomic_dec_and_lock(&dentry->d_count, &dentry->d_lock)) {
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
return;
+ }
dentry_lru_del(dentry);
__d_drop(dentry);
dentry = d_kill(dentry);
- spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
}
}
@@ -474,21 +505,31 @@ static void shrink_dentry_list(struct li
while (!list_empty(list)) {
dentry = list_entry(list->prev, struct dentry, d_lru);
- dentry_lru_del(dentry);
+
+ if (!spin_trylock(&dentry->d_lock)) {
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
+ cpu_relax();
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ __dentry_lru_del(dentry);
/*
* We found an inuse dentry which was not removed from
* the LRU because of laziness during lookup. Do not free
* it - just keep it off the LRU list.
*/
- spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
if (atomic_read(&dentry->d_count)) {
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
continue;
}
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
+
prune_one_dentry(dentry);
- /* dentry->d_lock was dropped in prune_one_dentry() */
- cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ /* dcache_lock and dentry->d_lock dropped */
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
}
}
@@ -509,32 +550,36 @@ static void __shrink_dcache_sb(struct su
int cnt = *count;
spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+relock:
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
while (!list_empty(&sb->s_dentry_lru)) {
dentry = list_entry(sb->s_dentry_lru.prev,
struct dentry, d_lru);
BUG_ON(dentry->d_sb != sb);
+ if (!spin_trylock(&dentry->d_lock)) {
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
+ cpu_relax();
+ goto relock;
+ }
+
/*
* If we are honouring the DCACHE_REFERENCED flag and the
* dentry has this flag set, don't free it. Clear the flag
* and put it back on the LRU.
*/
- if (flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED) {
- spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
- if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED) {
- dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_REFERENCED;
- list_move(&dentry->d_lru, &referenced);
- spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
- cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
- continue;
- }
+ if (flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED &&
+ dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED) {
+ dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_REFERENCED;
+ list_move(&dentry->d_lru, &referenced);
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ } else {
+ list_move_tail(&dentry->d_lru, &tmp);
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ if (!--cnt)
+ break;
}
-
- list_move_tail(&dentry->d_lru, &tmp);
- if (!--cnt)
- break;
- cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ /* XXX: re-add cond_resched_lock when dcache_lock goes away */
}
*count = cnt;
@@ -542,6 +587,7 @@ static void __shrink_dcache_sb(struct su
if (!list_empty(&referenced))
list_splice(&referenced, &sb->s_dentry_lru);
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
}
@@ -637,10 +683,12 @@ void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block
LIST_HEAD(tmp);
spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
while (!list_empty(&sb->s_dentry_lru)) {
list_splice_init(&sb->s_dentry_lru, &tmp);
shrink_dentry_list(&tmp);
}
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(shrink_dcache_sb);
@@ -659,7 +707,9 @@ static void shrink_dcache_for_umount_sub
/* detach this root from the system */
spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
dentry_lru_del(dentry);
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
__d_drop(dentry);
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
@@ -673,7 +723,9 @@ static void shrink_dcache_for_umount_sub
spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
list_for_each_entry(loop, &dentry->d_subdirs,
d_u.d_child) {
+ spin_lock(&loop->d_lock);
dentry_lru_del(loop);
+ spin_unlock(&loop->d_lock);
__d_drop(loop);
cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
}
@@ -850,6 +902,8 @@ static int select_parent(struct dentry *
struct dentry *dentry = list_entry(tmp, struct dentry, d_u.d_child);
next = tmp->next;
+ spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+
/*
* move only zero ref count dentries to the end
* of the unused list for prune_dcache
@@ -861,6 +915,8 @@ static int select_parent(struct dentry *
dentry_lru_del(dentry);
}
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+
/*
* We can return to the caller if we have found some (this
* ensures forward progress). We'll be coming back to find
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-16 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-16 14:09 [patch 00/28] [rfc] dcache scaling part 1 Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 01/28] fs: d_validate fixes Nick Piggin
[not found] ` <20101116142028.254946611-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2010-11-17 10:44 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-18 20:51 ` David Miller
2010-11-18 20:59 ` David Miller
2010-11-19 5:05 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-19 5:01 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 02/28] kernel: kmem_ptr_validate considered harmful Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 03/28] fs: dcache documentation cleanup Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 04/28] fs: change d_delete semantics Nick Piggin
2010-11-17 0:16 ` Tim Pepper
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 05/28] cifs: dont overwrite dentry name in d_revalidate Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 06/28] jfs: " Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 07/28] fs: change d_compare for rcu-walk Nick Piggin
2010-11-17 0:44 ` Tim Pepper
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 08/28] fs: change d_hash " Nick Piggin
2010-11-17 0:50 ` Tim Pepper
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 09/28] hostfs: simplify locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 10/28] fs: dcache scale hash Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 12/28] fs: dcache scale dentry refcount Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 13/28] fs: dcache scale d_unhashed Nick Piggin
2010-11-19 19:41 ` Tim Pepper
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 14/28] fs: dcache scale subdirs Nick Piggin
2010-11-19 19:41 ` Tim Pepper
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 15/28] fs: scale inode alias list Nick Piggin
2010-11-19 19:41 ` Tim Pepper
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 16/28] fs: Use rename lock and RCU for multi-step operations Nick Piggin
2010-11-19 19:42 ` Tim Pepper
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 17/28] fs: increase d_name lock coverage Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 18/28] fs: dcache remove dcache_lock Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 19/28] fs: dcache avoid starvation in dcache multi-step operations Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 20/28] fs: dcache reduce dput locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 21/28] fs: dcache reduce locking in d_alloc Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 22/28] fs: dcache reduce dcache_inode_lock Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 23/28] fs: dcache rationalise dget variants Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 24/28] fs: dcache reduce d_parent locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 25/28] fs: dcache reduce prune_one_dentry locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 26/28] fs: reduce dcache_inode_lock width in lru scanning Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 27/28] fs: use RCU in shrink_dentry_list to reduce lock nesting Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 14:09 ` [patch 28/28] fs: consolidate dentry kill sequence Nick Piggin
2010-11-17 2:12 ` [patch 00/28] [rfc] dcache scaling part 1 Dave Chinner
2010-11-17 10:56 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-17 11:19 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-17 12:01 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-19 19:43 ` Tim Pepper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101116142029.238128970@kernel.dk \
--to=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).