From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: chet.ramey@case.edu, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
bug-bash@gnu.org, chet@po.cwru.edu
Subject: Re: bash: Correct usage of F_SETFD
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:04:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101123000446.GA24667@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CEAEE3A.4090004@redhat.com>
Eric Blake [eblake@redhat.com] wrote:
| On 11/22/2010 03:16 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
| >> include/filecntl.h in bash-4.1 has following:
| >>
| >> #define SET_CLOSE_ON_EXEC(fd) (fcntl ((fd), F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC))
| >>
| >> Is that really the correct/intended usage of F_SETFD ?
| >
| > F_SETFD Set the close-on-exec flag associated with fildes to
| > the low order bit of arg (0 or 1 as above).
Is that the POSIX definition ? Following man page does not limit F_SETFD to
FD_CLOEXEC:
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/fcntl.2.html
F_SETFD (long)
Set the file descriptor flags to the value specified by arg.
| >
| >> If kernel ever adds a new flag to the fd, this would end up clearing the
| >> other new flag right ?
| >>
| >> Shouldn't bash use F_GETFD to get the current flags and set/clear just
| >> the FD_CLOEXEC bit ?
| >
| > I suppose it would matter if there are systems that have more than one
| > flag value.
|
| In practice, there aren't any such systems; but POSIX warns that current
| practice is no indicator of future systems, and that read-modify-write
| is the only way to use F_SETFD.
Yes, that seems to make more sense.
Sukadev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-22 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-22 20:16 bash: Correct usage of F_SETFD Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2010-11-22 22:16 ` Chet Ramey
2010-11-22 22:27 ` Eric Blake
2010-11-23 0:04 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
2010-11-23 14:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-11-23 14:51 ` Eric Blake
2010-11-23 17:51 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2010-11-24 1:17 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101123000446.GA24667@us.ibm.com \
--to=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bug-bash@gnu.org \
--cc=chet.ramey@case.edu \
--cc=chet@po.cwru.edu \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).