linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: npiggin@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] fs: fsync optimisations
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:03:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101129150325.GD26076@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101123140708.058372884@kernel.dk>

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:06:16AM +1100, npiggin@kernel.dk wrote:
> Optimise fsync by adding a datasync parameter to sync_inode_metadata to
> DTRT with writing back the inode (->write_inode in theory should have a
> datasync parameter too perhaps, but that's for another time).
> 
> Also, implement the metadata sync optimally rather than reusing the
> normal data writeback path. This means less useless moving the inode around the
> writeback lists, and less dropping and retaking of inode_lock, and avoiding
> the data writeback call with nr_pages == 0.

This patch looks good to me, but a few minor comments below:

> @@ -1315,13 +1315,49 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sync_inode);
>   *
>   * Note: only writes the actual inode, no associated data or other metadata.
>   */
> -int sync_inode_metadata(struct inode *inode, int wait)
> +int sync_inode_metadata(struct inode *inode, int datasync, int wait)
>  {
> +	struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
>  	struct writeback_control wbc = {
>  		.sync_mode = wait ? WB_SYNC_ALL : WB_SYNC_NONE,
>  		.nr_to_write = 0, /* metadata-only */
>  	};
> +	unsigned dirty, mask;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	return sync_inode(inode, &wbc);
> +	/*
> +	 * This is a similar implementation to writeback_single_inode.
> +	 * Keep them in sync.
> +	 */

I'd move this comment to above the function.

> +	/*
> +	 * Generic write_inode doesn't distinguish between sync and datasync,
> +	 * so even a datasync can clear the sync state. Filesystems which
> +	 * distiguish these cases must only clear 'mask' in their metadata
> +	 * sync code.
> +	 */

I don't understand this comment.  Currenly filesystems never clear
i_state bits by themselves.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-29 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-23 14:06 [patch 0/7] icache dirty / sync fixes npiggin
2010-11-23 14:06 ` [patch 1/7] fs: mark_inode_dirty barrier fix npiggin
2010-11-23 14:06 ` [patch 2/7] fs: simple fsync race fix npiggin
2010-11-29 14:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-30  0:05     ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-23 14:06 ` [patch 3/7] fs: introduce inode writeback helpers npiggin
2010-11-29 15:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-30  0:22     ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-23 14:06 ` [patch 4/7] fs: preserve inode dirty bits on failed metadata writeback npiggin
2010-11-29 14:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-30  0:08     ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-23 14:06 ` [patch 5/7] fs: ext2 inode sync fix npiggin
2010-11-30 11:26   ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-11-23 14:06 ` [patch 6/7] fs: fsync optimisations npiggin
2010-11-29 15:03   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-11-30  0:11     ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-23 14:06 ` [patch 7/7] fs: fix or note I_DIRTY handling bugs in filesystems npiggin
2010-11-23 15:04   ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-11-23 22:51   ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-24  0:23     ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101129150325.GD26076@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).