From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
To: Ed Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rcu-walk and dcache scaling tree update and status
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:59:10 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101213025910.GA6981@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201012122153.33427.edt@aei.ca>
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 09:53:32PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On Sunday 12 December 2010 21:37:33 Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Final note:
> > You won't be able to reproduce the parallel path walk scalability
> > numbers that I've posted, because the vfsmount refcounting scalability
> > patch is not included. I have a new idea for that now, so I'll be asking
> > for comments with that soon.
>
> I get this when building:
>
> security/security.c: In function 'security_inode_exec_permission':
> security/security.c:520: error: 'rcu' undeclared (first use in this function)
> security/security.c:520: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> security/security.c:520: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[1]: *** [security/security.o] Error 1
> make: *** [security] Error 2
>
> Missing include maybe?
Ah, missed permutation while doing a final build check. `rcu` should
just be renamed to `flags`.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-13 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20101213023733.GB6522@amd>
2010-12-13 2:42 ` [patch] fs: scale vfsmount refcount (was Re: rcu-walk and dcache scaling tree update and status) Nick Piggin
2010-12-13 3:31 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-13 3:43 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-13 7:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-13 8:33 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-14 12:40 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-15 8:16 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-12-15 10:24 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-13 2:53 ` rcu-walk and dcache scaling tree update and status Ed Tomlinson
2010-12-13 2:59 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-12-13 3:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-13 3:50 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-13 3:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-13 3:48 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-14 0:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-14 0:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-13 16:48 Sedat Dilek
2010-12-13 23:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-13 2:37 Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101213025910.GA6981@amd \
--to=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=edt@aei.ca \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).