From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] locks: eliminate fl_mylease callback Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 01:07:23 -0500 Message-ID: <20110104060723.GA15158@infradead.org> References: <1294110419-3105-1-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com> <1294110419-3105-4-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:45555 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750926Ab1ADGHY (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 01:07:24 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1294110419-3105-4-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:06:58PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > The nfs server only supports read delegations for now, so we don't care > how conflicts are determined. All we care is that unlocks are > recognized as matching the leases they are meant to remove. After the > last patch, a comparison of struct files will work for that purpose. So > we no longer need this callback. Please also update Documentation/filesystems/Locking for method removals.