linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 5/8] fs: ext2 inode sync fix
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:08:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110107190805.GH21922@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101218015117.436300300@kernel.dk>

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:46:39PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> There is a big fuckup with inode metadata writeback (I suspect in a lot
> of filesystems, but I've only dared to look at a couple as yet).
> 
> ext2 relies on ->write_inode being called from sync_inode_metadata in
> fsync in order to sync the inode. However I_DIRTY_SYNC gets cleared
> after a call to this guy, and it doesn't actually write back and wait
> on the inode block unless it is called for sync. This means that write_inode
> from background writeback can kill the inode dirty bits without the data
> getting to disk. Fsync will subsequently miss it.
> 
> The fix is for ->write_inode to dirty the buffers/cache, and then ->fsync to
> write back the dirty data. In the full filesystem sync case, buffercache
> writeback in the generic code will write back the dirty data. Other
> filesystems could use ->sync_fs for this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>

What are your plans for this patch?  Is this something you were
planning on pushing during the merge window, or should file system
maintainers try to fix up their code, since I gather this particular
change is independent of the previous patches in this patchset.  Is
that correct?

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-07 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-18  1:46 [patch 0/8] Inode data integrity patches Nick Piggin
2010-12-18  1:46 ` [patch 1/8] fs: mark_inode_dirty barrier fix Nick Piggin
2010-12-18  1:46 ` [patch 2/8] fs: simple fsync race fix Nick Piggin
2010-12-18  1:46 ` [patch 3/8] fs: introduce inode writeback helpers Nick Piggin
2010-12-18  1:46 ` [patch 4/8] fs: preserve inode dirty bits on failed metadata writeback Nick Piggin
2010-12-18  1:46 ` [patch 5/8] fs: ext2 inode sync fix Nick Piggin
2011-01-07 19:08   ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2010-12-18  1:46 ` [patch 6/8] fs: fsync optimisations Nick Piggin
2010-12-18  1:46 ` [patch 7/8] fs: fix or note I_DIRTY handling bugs in filesystems Nick Piggin
2010-12-29 15:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-03 15:03     ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-01-03 16:58       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-04  7:12         ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-04 14:22         ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-01-04  6:04     ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-04  6:39       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-04  7:52         ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-04  9:13           ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-04  9:28             ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-18  1:46 ` [patch 8/8] fs: add i_op->sync_inode Nick Piggin
2010-12-29 15:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-04  6:27     ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-04  6:57       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-04  8:03         ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-04  8:31           ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-04  9:25             ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-04  9:52               ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-06 20:49                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-07  4:48                   ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-07  7:25                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-11  3:44                       ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-04  9:25           ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-04  9:49             ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-06 20:45               ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-07  4:47                 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-07  7:24                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-07  7:29                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-07 13:10                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-07 18:30                       ` Ted Ts'o
2011-01-07 18:32                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-07 19:06   ` Ted Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110107190805.GH21922@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).