linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next - WARNING: at fs/block_dev.c:824 bd_link_disk_holder+0x92/0x1ac()
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:06:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110113110640.GC30719@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D2E6129.8000700@ce.jp.nec.com>

Hello,

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:19:21AM +0900, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
> > "block: simplify holder symlink handling"
> > 
> > dm linear just claims device in table constructor, I don't think it is bug in DM code.
> 
> The patch assumes only one holder disk for a claimed dev, which is not true.
> E.g. if there are multiple LVs on a PV.
> 
> In addition to that, since claiming is done in table constructor,
> there can be 2 claim instances for a slave/holder pair at a time
> when you load a table while there's already an active one.
> E.g. if you do lvresize.
> We need consideration for this, too.

Urgh... gees, so there actually was a user using all that cruft.
Sorry about the breakage, I'll see how multiple symlinks can be
restored.  I'm curious why this was added at all tho.  What was the
rationalization?  It's not like two subsystems can share the same
block device so marking the currently owning subsystem should have
been enough at the block layer.  There is no reason for block devices
to present information which is of no use to itself.  All that's
necessary is "this is taken by dm or md for more information, query
those".  dm and md need their own conf/representation layer anyway.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-13 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-12 17:34 linux-next - WARNING: at fs/block_dev.c:824 bd_link_disk_holder+0x92/0x1ac() Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-01-13  0:23 ` Milan Broz
2011-01-13  2:19   ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-01-13 11:06     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-01-13 11:26       ` [dm-devel] " Milan Broz
2011-01-13 12:27         ` Karel Zak
2011-01-13 13:12           ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 13:26             ` Karel Zak
2011-01-13 13:37               ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 13:52                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 13:58                 ` Milan Broz
2011-01-13 14:11                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 14:25                     ` Milan Broz
2011-01-13 14:30                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 14:43                         ` Kay Sievers
2011-01-13 15:03                           ` Milan Broz
2011-01-14  7:38                             ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-01-13 15:59                           ` Karel Zak
2011-01-13 16:10                             ` [dm-devel] " Kay Sievers
2011-01-14 15:07                               ` Karel Zak
2011-01-14 15:23                                 ` Kay Sievers
2011-01-13 14:45                         ` Theodore Tso
2011-01-13 20:18                           ` NeilBrown
2011-01-13 20:41                             ` Ted Ts'o
2011-01-14 16:20                               ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]                               ` <20110114162022.GC978@htj.dyndns.org>
2011-01-14 17:59                                 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-01-14 18:23                                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 14:49                         ` Milan Broz
2011-01-14 16:35                           ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 17:21     ` [PATCH] block: restore multiple bd_link_disk_holder() support Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 18:42       ` Milan Broz
2011-01-14  7:31         ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-01-14 16:10           ` [PATCH UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2011-01-14 21:09             ` Milan Broz
2011-01-17  0:18               ` Jun'ichi Nomura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110113110640.GC30719@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbroz@redhat.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).