linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: vfs-scale, d_revalidate from nfsd
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:38:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110114033846.GX19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=NJE-rXgFZ44BU4U2KrDg0657ucpupT+RGC4sj@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 02:29:11PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > ? ? ? ?if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU)
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?return -ECHILD;
> > ? ? ? ?return -EPERM;
> > }
> > when the sole intent of that sucker is to have dentry of /.xattr (pinned
> > in dcache and hashed all along) rejected on lookups from root? ?IOW, WTF
> > bother with -ECHILD here at all?
> 
> That's true. I guess I always have a weakness for doing "just one
> little easy optimisation/simplification" folded into patch that is supposed
> to be more mechanical changes :) I did have exactly that in the patch
> initially, but I decided it's better just to do everything with -ECHILD first.
> 
> That also gives the -ECHILD paths a bit more workout before
> fs conversions are done, too.

Not unless your test loads include trying to access pathnames like
/.xattr/whatever on reiserfs and watching those attempts fail...

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-14  3:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-13 14:03 vfs-scale, d_revalidate from nfsd J. R. Okajima
2011-01-14  2:57 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-14  3:03   ` Al Viro
2011-01-14  3:12     ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-14  3:20       ` Al Viro
2011-01-14  3:22         ` Al Viro
2011-01-14  3:29         ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-14  3:38           ` Al Viro [this message]
2011-01-15  3:47       ` J. R. Okajima
2011-01-15 18:11         ` Nick Piggin
2011-02-15  5:07   ` J. R. Okajima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110114033846.GX19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).